To Purchase
this Complete Test Bank with Answers Click the link Below
https://tbzuiqe.com/product/american-government-institutions-and-policies-brief-version-12th-edition-by-james-q-wilson-test-bank/
If face any problem or
Further information contact us At tbzuiqe@gmail.com
Sample Test
|
Chapter_03_Federalism
True / False
|
|
1. The American experience
suggests that many of the Antifederalists’ primary concerns about the size of
government were not unwarranted.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
51
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
|
2. The Constitution has been
amended only 23 times in more than 225 years.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
51
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
|
3. Over the last half-century,
state and local government spending has declined significantly.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
51
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
|
4. Politically, the most
consistent conflict has been relations between state and national
governments.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
52
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
|
5. The Founders envisioned a
system in which the national government would have supreme authority over the
state governments.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
54
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
6. The wording of the U.S.
Constitution regarding the federal government’s right to make laws is
purposely vague and elastic.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
55
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
7. Thomas Jefferson generally
thought the powers of the federal government should be narrowly construed and
strictly limited.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
55
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
8. Chief Justice John Marshall was
an early advocate of states’ rights.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
9. In McCulloch v. Maryland,
the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Maryland could not tax a bank
chartered by the national government.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
10. The doctrine of nullification
allows states to declare null and void a federal law that violates the
Constitution.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
57
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
11. The writings of Jefferson and
Madison influenced John C. Calhoun’s arguments for nullification of a federal
tariff.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
58
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
12. The concept of dual federalism
grew out of a debate on the issue of the commerce clause.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
58
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
13. In United States v. Lopez, the Supreme
Court said that Congress had exceeded its commerce clause power by creating
gun-free zones around schools.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
14. The Supreme Court has ruled
that Congress cannot require local police to conduct background checks on all
gun purchasers.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
15. The police power is generally
recognized as a state power.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
16. Great Britain has a federal
system much like our own.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
17. Many of the powers of the
federal government are exercised through the states.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
63
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
18. An initiative allows
voters to place legislative measures directly on the ballot by getting enough
signatures.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
19. The states play a key role in
social welfare, interstate highways, and managing water supplies.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
20. A categorical grant is one
made for a specific purpose defined by federal law.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
21. The response to Hurricane
Katrina showed that the various responsibilities of the federal, state, and
local governments are clear.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
63
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
22. Until the 1960s, the majority
of federal grants-in-aid served national purposes.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
70
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
23. Many governors and mayors
enjoy how narrow the purposes of categorical grants are.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
24. Block grants were intended to
give states more freedom in their spending.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
25. Generally, education waivers
are easy to acquire.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
74
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
26. When the Framers drafted the
Constitution, the Antifederalists opposed it primarily on the grounds that it
|
|
a.
|
empowered state governments.
|
|
|
b.
|
created a bicameral Congress.
|
|
|
c.
|
gave states the power to coin money.
|
|
|
d.
|
created a navy.
|
|
|
e.
|
gave too much power to the national government.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
51
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
27. __________ is a political
system in which the national government shares power with local governments.
|
|
a.
|
A unitary government
|
|
|
b.
|
Federalism
|
|
|
c.
|
A confederation
|
|
|
d.
|
A parliamentarian government
|
|
|
e.
|
A republic
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
51
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.1 – LO1
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
28. For the Founders, federalism
was a device to
|
|
a.
|
protect personal liberty.
|
|
|
b.
|
provide efficient local administration.
|
|
|
c.
|
encourage citizen participation.
|
|
|
d.
|
guarantee equality.
|
|
|
e.
|
protect against foreign invasion.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
53
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
29. In a confederation, the
national government derives its power from
|
|
a.
|
the people.
|
|
|
b.
|
the states.
|
|
|
c.
|
the Congress.
|
|
|
d.
|
the courts.
|
|
|
e.
|
the president.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
53
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
30. A federal republic derives its
powers from
|
|
a.
|
the people.
|
|
|
b.
|
the states.
|
|
|
c.
|
the Congress.
|
|
|
d.
|
the courts.
|
|
|
e.
|
the president.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
54
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
31. Madison’s description of
federalism in Federalist No.
46 suggests there should be little concern over conflicts between the federal
and state governments because
|
|
a.
|
the federal government would clearly be the winner in
such conflicts.
|
|
|
b.
|
the state government would clearly be the winner in such
conflicts.
|
|
|
c.
|
such conflicts would occur only on minor issues of
importance.
|
|
|
d.
|
they are different agents with different powers.
|
|
|
e.
|
the judicial branch would settle such disputes.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
54
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
32. The Founders did not include
in the U.S. Constitution an explicit statement of state powers, but added it
later in
|
|
a.
|
the Second Amendment.
|
|
|
b.
|
the Seventh Amendment.
|
|
|
c.
|
the Tenth Amendment.
|
|
|
d.
|
the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
|
e.
|
the First Amendment.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
54
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
33. Just what sort of commerce
Congress could regulate between the states was not spelled out in the U.S.
Constitution because
|
|
a.
|
the Founders assumed the federal government would only
have the powers explicity given to it.
|
|
|
b.
|
of an oversight.
|
|
|
c.
|
commerce was a new phenomenon.
|
|
|
d.
|
slavery was involved.
|
|
|
e.
|
New York delegates refused to allow discussion on the
matter.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
55
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
34. Which statement best
summarizes Madison’s view of federalism?
|
|
a.
|
He was a consistent supporter of the notion of a supreme
national government.
|
|
|
b.
|
He was a consistent supporter of the notion of the
supremacy of state governments.
|
|
|
c.
|
He was first an ardent supporter of national supremacy,
then of states’ rights.
|
|
|
d.
|
He was first an ardent supporter of states’ rights, then
of national supremacy.
|
|
|
e.
|
He assumed the national government would be supreme
except in times of war.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
55
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
35. The Civil War settled one part
of the issue of national supremacy versus states’ rights, namely, that
|
|
a.
|
state governments are supreme over the national
government.
|
|
|
b.
|
the national government derives its sovereignty from the
states.
|
|
|
c.
|
the national government derives its sovereignty from the
people.
|
|
|
d.
|
the national government derives its sovereignty from
both the people and the states.
|
|
|
e.
|
state governments derive their power from each other.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
55
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
36. The early chief justice whose
decisions generally gave the broadest possible sweep to federal
powers was
|
|
a.
|
Roger Taney.
|
|
|
b.
|
Frederick Vinson.
|
|
|
c.
|
John Marshall.
|
|
|
d.
|
Alexander Hamilton.
|
|
|
e.
|
John Harlan.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
37. An important outcome of
Marshall’s ruling in McCulloch
v. Maryland (1819)
was to
|
|
a.
|
place limits on the constitutional powers granted to
Congress by refusing McCulloch’s appeal.
|
|
|
b.
|
give greater power to the states in taxing agents of the
federal government, including banks.
|
|
|
c.
|
protect newspaper editors who publish stories critical
of the federal government.
|
|
|
d.
|
restrict the power of the Court in cases involving
conflicts between states and the federal government.
|
|
|
e.
|
confirm the supremacy of the federal government in the
exercise of the constitutional powers granted to Congress.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
38. In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819),
the Supreme Court ruled that
|
|
a.
|
states could form banks and tax them.
|
|
|
b.
|
the national government could charter banks and the
states could not tax those banks.
|
|
|
c.
|
the national government’s power was dependent on the
states.
|
|
|
d.
|
Congress erred when it created a national banking
system.
|
|
|
e.
|
states could not charter banks.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
39. A central premise in
Marshall’s analysis of federalism was that the government of the United
States was established by
|
|
a.
|
the convention.
|
|
|
b.
|
the states.
|
|
|
c.
|
the people.
|
|
|
d.
|
the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
e.
|
Congress
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
40. In McCulloch v. Maryland,
|
|
a.
|
the Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause permits
Congress to take actions when it is essential to a power that Congress has.
|
|
|
b.
|
the Constitution’s commerce clause gives the national
government exclusive power to regulate interstate commerce.
|
|
|
c.
|
Congress may not act to subject nonconsenting states to
lawsuits in state courts.
|
|
|
d.
|
the states may not regulate interstate commerce.
|
|
|
e.
|
the national government’s authority to require state
officials to administer or enforce a federal regulation is limited.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
41. The doctrine of nullification
refers to
|
|
a.
|
the power of Congress to veto state laws that violate
the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
b.
|
the claimed authority of the states to declare a federal
law void for violating the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
c.
|
the power of the president to veto state laws for
violating the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
d.
|
the authority of the president to dissolve Congress and
to call for new elections.
|
|
|
e.
|
the power of the federal government to invalidate state
laws on matters of commerce.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
57
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
42. When Congress passed laws (in
1798) to punish newspaper editors who published stories critical of the
federal government, these two political leaders suggested in the Virginia and
Kentucky Resolutions that the states had the right to nullify a federal law
that, in the state’s opinion, violated the Constitution.
|
|
a.
|
James Madison and Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
b.
|
John Adams and Alexander Hamilton
|
|
|
c.
|
John Dickinson and George Clinton
|
|
|
d.
|
Samuel Adams and John Hancock
|
|
|
e.
|
John Jay and John Marshall
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
57
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
43. During the battle over
slavery, the case for nullification was forcefully presented by
|
|
a.
|
William Jennings Randolph.
|
|
|
b.
|
Robert E. Lee.
|
|
|
c.
|
William Graham Sumner.
|
|
|
d.
|
John C. Calhoun.
|
|
|
e.
|
Jeb Stuart.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
58
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
44. The doctrine of dual
federalism grew out of a protracted debate on the subject of
|
|
a.
|
commerce.
|
|
|
b.
|
banking.
|
|
|
c.
|
manufacturing.
|
|
|
d.
|
welfare.
|
|
|
e.
|
licensing of commercial fishermen.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
58
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
45. Initially, it was supposed
that
|
|
a.
|
Congress could regulate interstate commerce.
|
|
|
b.
|
Congress could regulate interstate and intrastate
commerce.
|
|
|
c.
|
the state governments could regulate interstate
commerce.
|
|
|
d.
|
the state governments could regulate interstate and
intrastate commerce.
|
|
|
e.
|
there was no distinction between interstate and
intrastate commerce.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
58
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
46. The interstate commerce that
the federal government can regulate is now interpreted to include
|
|
a.
|
almost any kind of economic activity.
|
|
|
b.
|
only the movement of goods between states.
|
|
|
c.
|
almost any commerce in goods, but not labor
transactions.
|
|
|
d.
|
commerce between states and a handful of transactions
within states.
|
|
|
e.
|
shipping and handling, but not production.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
47. Which of the following is TRUE
regarding the Supreme Court’s modern rulings on regulation of interstate
commerce?
|
|
a.
|
The Court allows federal regulation of almost anything
related to interstate commerce.
|
|
|
b.
|
The Court permits only state regulation of most
interstate commerce.
|
|
|
c.
|
The Court has excluded every type of service provider
from federal regulation.
|
|
|
d.
|
The Court allows limited federal regulation of
interstate comemrce.
|
|
|
e.
|
No regulation of interstate commerce is permitted by the
state or federal governments.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
48. The text says that it would be
a mistake to conclude that the doctrine of dual federalism is
|
|
a.
|
entirely dead.
|
|
|
b.
|
alive and well.
|
|
|
c.
|
much changed.
|
|
|
d.
|
no longer a threat.
|
|
|
e.
|
an empirical reality.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
49. In United States v. Lopez (1995),
the Supreme Court ruled that Congress overstepped its power to regulate commerce
by prohibiting __________ in a school zone.
|
|
a.
|
guns
|
|
|
b.
|
adult bookstores
|
|
|
c.
|
cigarette sales
|
|
|
d.
|
alcohol sales
|
|
|
e.
|
dog races
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
50. In United States v. Morrison, the
Supreme Court ruled that violence against women
|
|
a.
|
was not an appropriate focus of punitive damages.
|
|
|
b.
|
did not substantially affect interstate commerce.
|
|
|
c.
|
could not be made the responsibility of distant
relatives.
|
|
|
d.
|
was nonjusticiable.
|
|
|
e.
|
could not be regulated by law.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
51. In __________, the Supreme
Court held that Congress could not require local police officers to conduct
background checks on all gun purchasers because doing so would violate the
Tenth Amendment.
|
|
a.
|
United States v.
Morrison
|
|
|
b.
|
McCulloch v.
Maryland
|
|
|
c.
|
United States v.
Lopez
|
|
|
d.
|
Printz v. United
States
|
|
|
e.
|
Marbury v.
Madison
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
52. In this 1999 decision, the
Supreme Court ruled that state employees could not sue to force state
compliance with federal fair-labor laws.
|
|
a.
|
McCulloch v.
Maryland
|
|
|
b.
|
Printz v. United
States
|
|
|
c.
|
Alden v. Maine
|
|
|
d.
|
United States v.
Lopez
|
|
|
e.
|
United States v.
Morrison
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
60
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
53. Under their police powers,
states can enact and enforce all of the following EXCEPT
|
|
a.
|
criminal codes.
|
|
|
b.
|
laws requiring children to attend school.
|
|
|
c.
|
restrictions on the availability of pornographic
materials.
|
|
|
d.
|
standards for DUI convictions.
|
|
|
e.
|
the regulation of interstate commerce.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
54. Which of the following
countries does NOT have
a federal system of government?
|
|
a.
|
United States
|
|
|
b.
|
Italy
|
|
|
c.
|
Canada
|
|
|
d.
|
Germany
|
|
|
e.
|
Australia
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
55. Which of the following allows
national governments the right to alter or even abolish local government?
|
|
a.
|
A constitutional government
|
|
|
b.
|
Federalism
|
|
|
c.
|
A unitary system
|
|
|
d.
|
Socialism
|
|
|
e.
|
A confederation
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
63
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
56. One of the reasons that our
local governments are independent of the national government is
|
|
a.
|
Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
b.
|
the power of free elections.
|
|
|
c.
|
the commitment of Americans to the idea of local self-government.
|
|
|
d.
|
the fact that the local tax structure requires local
administration.
|
|
|
e.
|
the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
63
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Applied
|
|
|
57. In the United States, programs
such as the interstate highway system and services to the unemployed
are most accurately
considered
|
|
a.
|
state functions that operate without any involvement on
the part of the federal government.
|
|
|
b.
|
federal functions, although state governments pay some
of the costs.
|
|
|
c.
|
state functions that are designated under the Tenth
Amendment.
|
|
|
d.
|
federal functions that operate without any involvement
on the part of state governments.
|
|
|
e.
|
state functions, although the federal government seeks
to regulate them.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
63
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
58. William H. Riker’s critical
conclusion is that the main effect of federalism since the Civil War has been
to perpetuate
|
|
a.
|
poverty.
|
|
|
b.
|
racism.
|
|
|
c.
|
corruption.
|
|
|
d.
|
fraud.
|
|
|
e.
|
sexism.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
64
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
59. In about half of the states,
voters can use this procedure to place legislative measures directly on the
ballot by getting enough signatures.
|
|
a.
|
Initiative
|
|
|
b.
|
Referendum
|
|
|
c.
|
Recall
|
|
|
d.
|
Logrolling
|
|
|
e.
|
Rollback
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
60. Which is a procedure that
enables voters to reject a measure adopted by the legislature?
|
|
a.
|
Initiative
|
|
|
b.
|
Referendum
|
|
|
c.
|
Recall
|
|
|
d.
|
Logrolling
|
|
|
e.
|
Rollback
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
61. This procedure, which is in
effect in over 20 states, permits voters to remove an elected official
from office.
|
|
a.
|
Initiative
|
|
|
b.
|
Referendum
|
|
|
c.
|
Recall
|
|
|
d.
|
Logrolling
|
|
|
e.
|
Rollback
|
|
ANSWER:
|
c
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
62. The first form of
grants-in-aid from the national government to the states was
|
|
a.
|
cash grants-in-aid.
|
|
|
b.
|
block grants.
|
|
|
c.
|
revenue sharing.
|
|
|
d.
|
categorical grants.
|
|
|
e.
|
land grants.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
67
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
63. In 1808, Congress gave
__________ to the states to pay for their militias, with the states in charge
of size, deployment, and command of these troops.
|
|
a.
|
$250
|
|
|
b.
|
$3,500
|
|
|
c.
|
$25,000
|
|
|
d.
|
$200,000
|
|
|
e.
|
$500,000
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
68
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
64. According U.S. Census Bureau
data, this program represented the largest federal grant to state and local
governments for fiscal year 2011.
|
|
a.
|
Medicaid
|
|
|
b.
|
Income security
|
|
|
c.
|
Education and training
|
|
|
d.
|
Transportation
|
|
|
e.
|
Community development
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
68
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.13.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
65. According to the text, the
grants-in-aid system grew rapidly because it helped state and local officials
resolve what dilemma?
|
|
a.
|
How to get federal money into state hands without
violating the U.S. Constitution
|
|
|
b.
|
How to limit federal taxation power without reducing aid
to states
|
|
|
c.
|
How to increase federal taxation power without violating
the U.S. Constitution
|
|
|
d.
|
How to shift financial control of state programs to the
federal government without violating states’ rights
|
|
|
e.
|
How to bring critical state functions gradually under
federal control
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
68
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
66. During the 1960s, federal
grants to states were increasingly based on
|
|
a.
|
the demands of the individual states.
|
|
|
b.
|
what state officials perceived to be important state needs.
|
|
|
c.
|
the power of organized interest groups.
|
|
|
d.
|
what federal officials perceived to be national needs.
|
|
|
e.
|
the demands of coalitions of states.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
70
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
67. Of the following, which is NOT
considered part of the intergovernmental lobby?
|
|
a.
|
Local police chiefs
|
|
|
b.
|
Local gas station owners
|
|
|
c.
|
County highway commissioners
|
|
|
d.
|
Superintendents of schools
|
|
|
e.
|
Mayors
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
70
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
68. Which of the following is NOT
a member of the “Big 7”?
|
|
a.
|
The National Governors Association
|
|
|
b.
|
The National League of Cities
|
|
|
c.
|
The National Conference of State Legislatures
|
|
|
d.
|
The National Association of Counties
|
|
|
e.
|
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
70
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
69. A categorical grant is a transfer
of federal funds designed for
|
|
a.
|
the private sector.
|
|
|
b.
|
discretionary use by a state.
|
|
|
c.
|
the accomplishment of broad goals.
|
|
|
d.
|
programs with matching grants.
|
|
|
e.
|
specific purposes.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
e
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
70. According to the text, block
grants have enjoyed only marginal success, in part because
|
|
a.
|
the federal government steadily increased the number of
strings attached to such grants.
|
|
|
b.
|
money from categorical grants shrank so low as to make
these other grants essential.
|
|
|
c.
|
these grants were based on local priorities rather than
on the needs of the nation as a whole.
|
|
|
d.
|
these grants discouraged federal control over how the
money was to be used.
|
|
|
e.
|
these grants were not attractive to members of Congress.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Conceptual
|
|
|
71. __________ are terms set by
the national government that states must meet whether or not they accept
federal grants.
|
|
a.
|
Conditions of aid
|
|
|
b.
|
Mandates
|
|
|
c.
|
Strings-attached edict
|
|
|
d.
|
Court decisions
|
|
|
e.
|
Pontifications
|
|
ANSWER:
|
b
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
73
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
72. The number of unfunded
mandates is highest concerning what type of policy?
|
|
a.
|
health policy
|
|
|
b.
|
transportation
|
|
|
c.
|
civil rights
|
|
|
d.
|
the environment
|
|
|
e.
|
education policy
|
|
ANSWER:
|
d
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
74
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
73. According to the text,
__________ waivers are “almost impossible to acquire.”
|
|
a.
|
environmental protection
|
|
|
b.
|
health policy
|
|
|
c.
|
education
|
|
|
d.
|
human services
|
|
|
e.
|
transportation
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
74
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
74. The text suggests that we
might expect to find more mandates in policy areas where the government
|
|
a.
|
spends less.
|
|
|
b.
|
spends more.
|
|
|
c.
|
wants the states to spend less.
|
|
|
d.
|
has been involved a longer period of time.
|
|
|
e.
|
cannot possibly enforce them.
|
|
ANSWER:
|
a
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
74
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
NOTES:
|
Factual
|
|
|
75. Compare the competing views of
federalism held by Hamilton and Jefferson.
|
ANSWER:
|
∙ Hamilton: The
people created the national government; laws and treaties are made pursuant
to the “supreme law of the land” (the Constitution); the national
government was the superior and leading force in political affairs, its
powers should be broadly defined and liberally construed.
∙ Jefferson: The government is the product of
agreement among the states; the principle threat to liberty will probably
come from the national government, thus its powers should be narrowly
construed.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
54
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
76. Summarize the facts of the
case and discuss the implications for federalism from the Supreme Court’s
ruling in McCulloch
v. Maryland.
|
ANSWER:
|
Maryland attempted to tax a Baltimore bank created by
Congress. McCulloch, a cashier, refused to pay and was taken to court. The
Court ruled Congress had the power to create a bank even though the
Constitution did not explicitly grant such a power. The national government
was created by the people and, therefore, superior to the state
governments. Due to the elastic clause (or the necessary and proper
clause), Congress has “implied power” to put in place its enumerated ones.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
56
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
77. Explain how Madison,
Jefferson, and John C. Calhoun defined the doctrine of nullification.
|
ANSWER:
|
∙ Madison and Jefferson opposed 1798 laws that punished
newspapers critical of the government. In the Virginia-Kentucky
Resolutions, they argued states had the right to “nullify” federal laws
that, in the opinion of the states, violated the Constitution.
∙ Calhoun opposed a tariff enacted by the national government and its
efforts to restrict slavery. He argued states had the right to declare
acts unconstitutional, null and void.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
57
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
78. Note some recent examples of
cases where the U.S. Supreme Court has revealed its view that the commerce
clause does not justify any federal action.
|
ANSWER:
|
∙ United
States v. Morrison: Court ruled attacks against women do not
substantially affect interstate commerce.
∙ Printz v. United States: Court ruled that a federal
law requiring local police to conduct background checks on all gun purchasers
was unconstitutional.
∙ Alden v. Maine: Court ruled state employees could not
sue to force state compliance with federal fair labor laws.
∙ Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports
Authority: Court further expanded states’ sovereignty immunity
from private lawsuits.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
59
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.2 – LO2
|
|
|
79. Compare and contrast the
governmental structure of the United States and the nations with a unitary
government.
|
ANSWER:
|
- The
United States is a federal system which means there are local
(territorial, regional, provincial, state, or municipal) units of
government—as well as a national government— that can make final
decisions with respect to at least some governmental activities and whose
existence is specially protected
- A
unitary system is one in which local governments as they possess
can be altered or even abolished by the national government and
cannot plausibly claim to have final authority over any
significant governmental activities.
- In
a unitary system, welfare, highways, education, the police, and the
use of land are all matters that are directed nationally. In a
federal system, highways and some welfare programs are largely
state functions (though they make use of federal money), while education,
policing, and land-use controls are primarily local (city,
county, or special-district) functions.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
62
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
80. What are some formal
mechanisms that some state constitutions employ in order to incorporate
direct democracy into the governmental process?
|
ANSWER:
|
∙ Initiative: Allows voters to place
legislative measures on the ballot.
∙ Referendum: Allows voters
to reject a measure adopted by the legislature.
∙ Recall: Voters can remove
an elected official from office.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
66
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.3 – LO3
|
|
|
81. Explain what grants-in-aid are
and why the system that grew up around them was so attractive to state officials.
|
ANSWER:
|
The first began in the form of land grants of federal
money. These were soon accompanied by cash grants. Grants-in-aid are
federal monies put into states hands; i.e., Washington would pay the bills;
the states would run the programs. Today, hundreds of programs exist. The
money seemed to be “free.” States did not have to propose, collect, or take
responsibility for federal taxes. However, states could claim credit for
the federally funded projects. To states, the money was there. It was
attractive because there were budget surpluses. As those surpluses
dwindled, Washington inaugurated the income tax. Moreover, the federal
government managed the currency and could print more at will.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
67
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
82. Explain what a “categorical
grant” is, and why their incorporation into block grants never seemed to
quite satisfy critics.
|
ANSWER:
|
Categorical
grant: A grant for a specific purpose defined by
federal law, usually requiring states or localities to put up “matching”
funds.
State officials complained that they were too narrow and specific.
Moreover, the federal government increasingly attached strings, or
conditions. Congress and the federal bureaucracy liked category grants.
Some consolidation into block grants occurred, but few block grants were
enacted. Block grants attracted little support from lobbyists and groups.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
71
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
83. Compare and contrast the
following two kinds of federal controls on state governments: conditions of aid and mandates. Be sure
to list examples of each.
|
ANSWER:
|
∙ Conditions of
aid are requirements placed on state governments when
they accepted federal dollars. Examples are: Environmental impact studies,
“prevailing wage” requirements, citizen participation, and
nondiscriminatory in hiring.
∙ Mandates are terms set by the federal
government that states must meet whether or not they accepted federal dollars.
Examples are: school-desegregation, Massachusetts hiring of firefighters,
police brutality in Philadelphia, and planning in Chicago. Most federal
mandates occur in civil rights and environmental issues.
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
73
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
84. Discuss why so many laws that
Congress passes are not always favored by mayors and governors.
|
ANSWER:
|
-One reason is that members of Congress represent
different constituencies from the same localities.
-Another reason is that the organizations that once linked members of
Congress to local groups have eroded. The political parties which once
allowed many localities to speak with a single voice in Washington, have
decayed to the point where most members of Congress now operate as free
agents, judging local needs and national moods independently
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
76
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.3.4 – LO4
|
|
|
Chapter_05_Civil_Rights
True / False
|
|
1. Until 1967, 16 states outlawed marriages
between whites and nonwhites.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
108
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
2. Laws cannot treat people
differently.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
108
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
3. In the late 1800s, the Supreme
Court struck down a law that required that juries consist only of
white males.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
112-113
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
4. In 1883, the Supreme Court
ruled that racial discrimination in public accommodations (such as hotels)
was unconstitutional.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
112
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
5. In Plessy v. Ferguson,
the Supreme Court ruled that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment guaranteed political equality but not social equality.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
113
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
6. The NAACP was formed by a group
consisting of both whites and blacks.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
113
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
7. The decision of the Supreme
Court in Brown was
unanimous.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
114
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
8. In the immediate aftermath
of Brown v. Board of Education,
southern resistance to school integration quickly collapsed.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
115
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
9. The federal government withholding
federal aid to segregated schools in the 1970s led many schools
to integrate.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
115
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
10. Findings from social science
studies on the impact of segregation on black children influenced the Supreme
Court’s ruling in Brown.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
116
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
11. De jure segregation refers to
segregation that is the result of residential patterns as opposed to
deliberate government policy.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
117
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
12. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education settled
the issues of busing across city and county lines.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
117
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
13. In 1992, the Supreme Court
ruled that schools could not be held responsible for segregation caused
solely by segregated living patterns.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
118
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
14. Martin Luther King, Jr. was arrested
in Montgomery, Alabama because he refused to give up his bus seat to a white
man.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
119
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
15. The strategy known as civil disobedience
was done by peacefully disobeying a law and accepting the punishment.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
119
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
16. The outcome of the 1964
elections helped the civil rights forces.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
121
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.1 – LO1
|
|
|
17. The courts have so far
declined to submit laws that treat men and women differently to the strict
scrutiny test.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
124
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.2 – LO2
|
|
|
18. States can give widows a
property-tax exemption not given to widowers.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
125
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.4 – LO4
|
|
|
19. The Supreme Court ruled in
favor of Virginia Military Institute when its tradition of admitting only
male cadets was challenged.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
125-126
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.4 – LO4
|
|
|
20. It is illegal for an employee
to experience a work environment that has been made hostile or intimidating
by a steady pattern of offensive sexual teasing, jokes, or obscenity.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
126
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.3 – LO3
|
|
|
21. Privacy is mentioned only once
in the Constitution.
|
ANSWER:
|
False
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
127
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.4 – LO4
|
|
|
22. In 1989, the Webster case
upheld some state restrictions on abortion.
|
ANSWER:
|
True
|
|
REFERENCES:
|
128
|
|
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
|
AGBR.WILS.12.5.4 – LO4
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment