Business Law Arlen Langvardt 17th Edition – Test Bank

 

To Purchase this Complete Test Bank with Answers Click the link Below

 

https://tbzuiqe.com/product/business-law-arlen-langvardt-17th-edition-test-bank/

 

If face any problem or Further information contact us At tbzuiqe@gmail.com

 

 

Sample Test

Business Law, 17e (Langvardt)

Chapter 3   Business and the Constitution

 

1) Article V of the Constitution makes the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States supreme over state law.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Article VI of the Constitution makes the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States supreme over state law. Article V of the Constitution sets forth the procedures for amending the Constitution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

2) The exercise of the power of judicial review depends on the court’s reading of the Constitution.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Under the power of judicial review, courts can declare the actions of other government bodies unconstitutional. How courts exercise this power depends on how they choose to read the Constitution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Evolution of the Constitution and the Role of the Supreme Court

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

3) Congress cannot invalidate state laws that are passed pursuant to the state’s police power.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Congress can preempt state regulation under the supremacy clause.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

4) The Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection guarantee has been made applicable to federal government action through incorporation of it within the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection guarantee has been made applicable to federal government action through incorporation of it within the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-03 Describe the incorporation doctrine’s role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

5) The “ends” component of a means-ends test specifies how significant a social purpose must be in order to justify the restriction of a right.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The “ends” component of a means-ends test specifies how significant a social purpose must be in order to justify the restriction of a right.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

6) Corporations engaging in political expression are entitled to the same First Amendment protection as an individual engaged in such speech.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  If a corporation engages in political or other noncommercial expression, it is entitled to full First Amendment protection, just as an individual would be if he/she engaged in such speech.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

7) The First Amendment prohibits state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  There is no First Amendment obstacle to federal or state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

8) Federal restrictions that forbid beer producers from listing the alcohol content of their beer on product labels are unconstitutional.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In Coors v. Rubin (1995), the Supreme Court struck down federal restrictions that kept beer producers from listing the alcohol content of their beer on product labels.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

9) Today, social and economic regulations generally receive rational basis review when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The rational basis review/test is the standard usually applied to social and economic regulations that are challenged as denying equal protection.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

10) Today, discrimination on the basis of gender receives full strict scrutiny compared to discrimination on the basis of race, which receives intermediate scrutiny.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Discrimination on the basis of race receives full strict scrutiny while gender discrimination receives intermediate scrutiny.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

11) Government action that discriminates on the basis of illegitimacy receives full strict scrutiny.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Government action that discriminates on the basis of illegitimacy receives intermediate scrutiny.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

12) The Contract Clause applies only to state laws that impair past contracts—contracts made before passage of the state law in question.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Contract Clause deals with state laws that change the parties’ performance obligations under an existing contract after that contract has been made.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

13) The Commerce Clause limits the states’ ability to discriminate against interstate commerce.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Commerce Clause limits the states’ ability to burden or discriminate against interstate commerce.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-08 Explain the burden-on-commerce doctrine’s role in making certain state government actions unconstitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

14) If a state law discriminates against interstate commerce, then the strictest scrutiny will be applied in the determination of its constitutionality.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In a 1994 case, the Supreme Court said that if a state law discriminates against interstate commerce, the strictest scrutiny will be applied in the determination of the law’s constitutionality.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-08 Explain the burden-on-commerce doctrine’s role in making certain state government actions unconstitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

15) The Takings Clause comes from the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Takings Clause contained in the Fifth Amendment states that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

16) The constitutional right of privacy includes various rights that the Supreme Court has declared as fundamental for citizens and families.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Supreme Court has declared that the right of privacy includes the rights to marry, have children and direct one’s children’s education and upbringing, enjoy marital privacy, use contraception, and, within certain limits, elect to have an abortion.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

17) Article III of the Constitution determines the types of cases the federal courts may decide.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Article III gives the judicial power of the United States to the Supreme Court and the other federal courts later established by Congress. Article III also determines the types of cases the federal courts may decide.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

18) Judges sometimes may be reluctant to declare statutes unconstitutional because they are wary of power struggles with a more representative body such as Congress.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Today, judges exercise political power by declaring the actions of legislatures unconstitutional under standards largely of the judiciary’s own devising. This sometimes leads to charges that courts are undemocratic, elitist institutions. Such charges put political constraints on judges because courts depend on the other branches of government—and ultimately on public belief in judges’ fidelity to the rule of law—to make their decisions effective. Therefore, judges sometimes may be reluctant to declare statutes unconstitutional because they are wary of power struggles with a more representative body such as Congress.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Evolution of the Constitution and the Role of the Supreme Court

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

19) Federal legislation may be found to be constitutional even if it is not based on a power specifically stated in the Constitution.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Federal legislation cannot be constitutional if it is not based on a power specifically stated in the Constitution.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

20) As evidenced by National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the case in the text, Congress’s taxing power is seen as very narrow.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Today, the reach of the taxing power is seen as very broad, as evidenced by National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

21) The U.S. Constitution provides distinct powers to Congress, the President, and the federal courts. This is the principle of:

1.   A) separation of powers.

2.   B) federal supremacy.

3.   C) judicial review.

4.   D) due process of law.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  According to the principle of separation of powers, the U.S. Constitution provides distinct powers to Congress, the President, and the federal courts.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

22) ________ enumerates the principle of federal supremacy.

1.   A) Article III

2.   B) Article IV

3.   C) Article V

4.   D) Article VI

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Article VI makes the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States supreme over state law. In other words, it enumerates the principle of federal supremacy.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

23) Which of the following gives the President executive power?

1.   A) Congress

2.   B) The Supreme Court

3.   C) The U.S. Constitution

4.   D) State legislatures

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Article II of the U.S. Constitution gives the President the executive power—the power to execute or enforce the laws passed by Congress.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

24) Which of the following doctrines empowers courts to declare the actions of other government bodies unconstitutional?

1.   A) Judicial review

2.   B) Federal supremacy

3.   C) Federalism

4.   D) Separation of powers

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Under the power of judicial review, courts can declare the actions of other government bodies unconstitutional; and how courts exercise this power depends on how they choose to read the Constitution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Evolution of the Constitution and the Role of the Supreme Court

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

25) Enumerated powers are those powers that ________ can exercise.

1.   A) states

2.   B) Congress

3.   C) U.S. Supreme Court

4.   D) trial courts

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The U.S. Constitution lists the powers that Congress can exercise; these are called enumerated powers.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

26) Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the states. Pursuant to this power, Congress passed legislation forbidding women from crossing state lines to buy or sell goods. Will the statute be held constitutional?

1.   A) Yes, because Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce.

2.   B) Yes, because Congress has not exceeded its enumerated power in enacting the legislation.

3.   C) No, because it conflicts with the equal protection guarantee.

4.   D) Yes, because federal laws are always superior.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The equal protection guarantee serves as a check on the enumerated power given to Congress to regulate commerce among the states.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

27) Both Congress and state legislatures can make laws within areas covered under their concurrent powers, unless Congress preempts state regulation under the:

1.   A) Supremacy Clause.

2.   B) Takings Clause.

3.   C) “checks and balances” system.

4.   D) Regulatory Clause.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  In many other areas, Congress and state legislatures have concurrent powers, i.e., both can make law within those areas. However, Congress preempts state regulation under the Supremacy Clause.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

28) Which of the following is an important state legislative power that works concurrently with many congressional powers?

1.   A) Enumerated power

2.   B) Police power

3.   C) Independent checks

4.   D) Taxing power

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Police power is an important state legislative power that works concurrently with congressional powers to regulate for the public health, safety, morals, and welfare.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

29) What was the original reason for granting Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce after the Revolution?

1.   A) To generate federal revenue

2.   B) To establish federal supremacy

3.   C) To block protectionist state restrictions on interstate trade

4.   D) To enable a transition to a unitary system

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The original reason for giving Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce was to nationalize economic matters by blocking the protectionist state restrictions on interstate trade that were common after the Revolution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

30) The Commerce Clause has become a federal power with an extensive regulatory reach. This is largely due to judicial decisions regulating:

1.   A) the channels of interstate commerce.

2.   B) and protecting the instrumentalities of interstate commerce.

3.   C) persons or things in interstate commerce.

4.   D) activities that substantially affect interstate commerce.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The literal language of the Commerce Clause simply empowers Congress to regulate commerce that occurs among the states. However, due to judicial decisions regarding congressional action regulating activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, the Commerce Clause has become a federal power with an extensive regulatory reach.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

31) Which of the following is true of the Commerce Clause in present times?

1.   A) It has become a federal power with an extensive regulatory reach.

2.   B) It no longer blocks state regulations that hinder interstate commerce.

3.   C) It has been preempted by the federal taxing and spending powers.

4.   D) It allows Congress to regulate interstate commerce but not intrastate activities affecting it.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Due to several judicial decisions in this area, the Commerce Clause has become a federal power with an extensive regulatory reach.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

32) What is the main purpose of the taxing power?

1.   A) To enact healthcare reform law.

2.   B) To regulate grants to the states.

3.   C) To regulate interstate commerce.

4.   D) To raise revenue for the federal government.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The main purpose of the taxing power, explained in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, is to provide a means of raising revenue for the federal government.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

33) Which of the following augments the powers of Congress by permitting it to enact laws that are useful or conducive to the exercise of those enumerated powers?

1.   A) The Commerce Clause

2.   B) The taxing power

3.   C) The spending power

4.   D) The Necessary and Proper Clause

 

Answer:D

Explanation:  Article I, Section 8 concludes with a provision granting Congress the further power to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers ….” This actually augments the powers of Congress by permitting Congress to enact laws that are useful or conducive to the exercise of those enumerated powers.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

34) Which of the following prevents the federal government from depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”?

1.   A) First Amendment

2.   B) Fifth Amendment

3.   C) Fourteenth Amendment

4.   D) Fifteenth Amendment

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The Fifth Amendment prevents the federal government from depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-03 Describe the incorporation doctrine’s role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

35) The ________ Amendment says that no state shall “deny to any person … the equal protection of the laws.”

1.   A) Fifth

2.   B) Tenth

3.   C) Fourteenth

4.   D) Sixteenth

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The Fourteenth Amendment says that no state shall “deny to any person . . . the equal protection of the laws.” It guarantees the right of equal protection to all citizens.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-03 Describe the incorporation doctrine’s role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

36) The ________ requirement ensures that most of the Constitution’s individual rights provisions block only the actions of government bodies, and not private bodies, in cases of violation of rights.

1.   A) independent checks

2.   B) due process

3.   C) state action

4.   D) federal supremacy

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Most of the Constitution’s individual rights provisions block only the actions of government bodies, federal, state, and local. Private behavior that denies individual rights, while perhaps forbidden by statute, is very seldom a constitutional matter. This government action or state action requirement forces courts to distinguish between governmental behavior and private behavior.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-03 Describe the incorporation doctrine’s role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

37) The Supreme Court judicially created a means-ends test because:

1.   A) individual rights must be protected at any cost.

2.   B) the correct procedure of law has to be followed.

3.   C) no constitutional right is absolute.

4.   D) the conduct of public officials must be scrutinized.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Such tests have been developed by the Supreme Court because no constitutional right is absolute and courts have to strike a balance between individual rights and the social needs that may justify their suppression.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

38) The ________ is a very relaxed means-ends test of constitutionality that challenged laws usually pass with ease.

1.   A) rational basis test

2.   B) intermediate scrutiny

3.   C) due process test

4.   D) full strict scrutiny

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The rational basis test is a very relaxed test of constitutionality that challenged laws usually pass with ease. A typical formulation of the rational basis test might say that government action need only have a reasonable relation to the achievement of a legitimate government purpose to be constitutional.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

39) The sex discrimination test is an example of the:

1.   A) rational basis test.

2.   B) intermediate scrutiny.

3.   C) full strict scrutiny test.

4.   D) due process test.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Sex discrimination receives an intermediate scrutiny means-ends test.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

40) “The challenged law must be necessary to the fulfillment of a compelling government purpose.” This describes:

1.   A) the rational basis test.

2.   B) intermediate scrutiny.

3.   C) the full strict scrutiny test.

4.   D) the still-controlling test.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Governments may offer this justification for certain activities, which then makes those activities subject to a full strict scrutiny test. Government action that is subjected to this rigorous test of constitutionality is usually struck down.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

41) Which of the following would receive stricter scrutiny?

1.   A) Right to own a business

2.   B) Right of teenagers to congregate

3.   C) Classifications based on gender

4.   D) Right to advertise

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Sex discrimination test is an example of intermediate scrutiny. The right to own a business, right of teenagers to congregate, and the right to advertise would be subjection the rational basis test.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-04 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

42) The First Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” What is often described as being at the “core” of the First Amendment?

1.   A) Commercial speech

2.   B) Artistic speech

3.   C) Advertisements

4.   D) Political speech

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The First Amendment protects speech of a literary or artistic nature, speech dealing with scientific, economic, educational, and ethical issues, and expression on many other matters of public interest or concern. However, it is political speech—expression that deals in some fashion with government, government issues or policies, public officials, or political candidates—that is often described as being at the “core” of the First Amendment.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

43) When is a corporation entitled to full First Amendment protection?

1.   A) When it engages in artistic speech.

2.   B) When it works for the public good.

3.   C) When it aids in promoting federal power.

4.   D) When it engages in political speech.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  If a corporation engages in political or other noncommercial expression, it is entitled to full First Amendment protection, just as an individual would be if he/she engaged in such speech.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

44) Which of the following is true of noncommercial speech?

1.   A) It does not cover political speech.

2.   B) Books, musical works, and journal articles are classified as noncommercial speech, but are not fully protected due to the existence of an underlying profit motive.

3.   C) It receives the full benefit of the First Amendment protection.

4.   D) Any kind of corporate speech is classified as noncommercial speech.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Some corporate speech is classified as commercial speech, and though all corporate speakers have First Amendment rights, not all speech of a corporation is fully protected. Books, musical works, and journal articles are normally classified as noncommercial speech—and are thus fully protected—despite the typical existence of an underlying profit motive.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

45) Which of the following statements regarding commercial speech is true?

1.   A) It enjoys the same First Amendment protection as political expression.

2.   B) It is not protected if it misleads or seeks to promote an illegal activity.

3.   C) It receives rational basis protection, if it is not misleading.

4.   D) Movies, television programs, and magazine articles are normally classified as commercial speech and are thus fully protected.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Commercial speech receives no protection if it misleads or seeks to promote an illegal activity. As a result, there is no First Amendment obstacle to federal or state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

46) In the context of commercial speech, the Supreme Court developed the ________ test, which amounts to intermediate scrutiny.

1.   A) means-ends

2.   B) still-controlling

3.   C) proximate cause

4.   D) rational basis

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Roughly three decades ago, the Supreme Court developed a still-controlling test that amounts to intermediate scrutiny. Under this test, a government restriction on protected commercial speech does not violate the First Amendment if the government proves that a substantial government interest underlies the restriction, that the restriction directly advances the underlying interest, and that the restriction is no more extensive than necessary to further the interest.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-05 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

47) Which of the following characterizes procedural due process?

1.   A) The procedures are clearly set forth in the Constitution.

2.   B) It entitles one to a fair hearing before action is taken.

3.   C) It challenges rules that set standards of behavior for organized social life.

4.   D) It does not require adequate notice to be given before action.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Although the requirements of procedural due process vary from situation to situation, the core idea is that one is entitled to adequate notice of the government action to be taken against him/her and to some sort of fair trial or hearing before that action can occur. Procedural due process does not challenge rules of substantive law—the rules that set standards of behavior for organized social life.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

48) The right to notice of the charges brought against you and to some kind of fair trial or hearing to prove those charges are central requirements of:

1.   A) substantive due process.

2.   B) equal protection.

3.   C) procedural due process.

4.   D) economic due process.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Although the requirements of procedural due process vary from situation to situation, the core idea is that one is entitled to adequate notice of the government action to be taken against him/her and to some sort of fair trial or hearing before that action can occur.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

49) Which of the following is applied to the equal protection standard?

1.   A) The due process test

2.   B) The still-controlling test

3.   C) The proximate cause test

4.   D) The rational basis test

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The basic equal protection standard is the rational basis test. This is the standard usually applied to social and economic regulations that are challenged as denying equal protection.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

50) Which of the following is generally subject to a rational basis review?

1.   A) Regulation of political speech that is challenged under the First Amendment.

2.   B) Regulation of commercial speech that is challenged under the First Amendment.

3.   C) Laws that discriminate on the basis of illegitimacy.

4.   D) Laws that regulate social and economic matters.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The basic equal protection standard is the rational basis test. This is the standard usually applied to social and economic regulations that are challenged as denying equal protection.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

51) The equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. However, laws that discriminate regarding ________ are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.

1.   A) education

2.   B) profession

3.   C) race

4.   D) age

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The rational basis test is the basic equal protection standard. Some classifications, however, receive tougher means-ends scrutiny such as race and ethnicity. Classifications disadvantaging racial or national minorities receive the most rigorous kind of strict scrutiny and are almost never constitutional.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

52) Which of the following has NOT been categorized as a suspect class?

1.   A) Race and national origin

2.   B) Alienage

3.   C) Sexual orientation

4.   D) Illegitimacy

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Race and national origin, alienage, and illegitimacy are suspect classes. Sexual orientation is not a suspect class at the federal level though some states recognize sexual orientation as a suspect class for purposes of discrimination suits.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

53) Which of the following is true of the Contract Clause?

1.   A) It applies to laws that impair contracts made after the law’s passage.

2.   B) It imposes tougher standards on government contracts than on private contracts.

3.   C) It does not apply to government contracts.

4.   D) It has gradually increased in importance from the 19th century to the 20th century.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states: “No State shall . . . pass any . . . Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” Known as the Contract Clause, this provision deals with state laws that change the parties’ performance obligations under an existing contract after that contract has been made. In two early 19th-century cases, the Contract Clause was held to protect the obligations of governmental contracts. The Contract Clause probably was the most important constitutional check on state regulation of the economy for much of the 19th century. By the mid-20th century, most observers treated the clause as being of historical interest only.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

54) Which of the following is also known as the “dormant” Commerce Clause?

1.   A) Power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

2.   B) Power of Congress to regulate instrumentalities of interstate commerce.

3.   C) Limits on the states’ ability to burden interstate commerce.

4.   D) Limits on Congress to burden states with taxes.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The Commerce Clause limits the states’ ability to burden or discriminate against interstate commerce. Since this limitation is not expressly stated in the Constitution but arises by implication from the Commerce Clause, it is also called the “dormant” Commerce Clause.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-08 Explain the burden-on-commerce doctrine’s role in making certain state government actions unconstitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

55) In general, which of the following is least likely to unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce?

1.   A) A state law requiring that all state vehicles burn gasoline produced and refined within the state.

2.   B) A state law imposing tougher purity standards on food imported from out of state than from food produced within the state.

3.   C) A state law requiring in-state liquor distillers to post the prices at which they will sell within the state, and not to exceed those prices when they sell in other states.

4.   D) A state tax on gasoline that makes it more expensive for trucking companies to route their trucks through the state.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Laws may unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce when they directly regulate that commerce. This can occur, for example, when state price regulations require firms to post the prices at which they will sell within the state and to promise that they will not sell below those prices in other states. Because they affect prices in other states, such regulations directly regulate interstate commerce and usually are unconstitutional.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-08 Explain the burden-on-commerce doctrine’s role in making certain state government actions unconstitutional.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

56) Which of the following independent checks blocks only state laws and not federal laws?

1.   A) Equal protection

2.   B) The First Amendment

3.   C) Federal preemption

4.   D) Due process

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The constitutional principle of federal supremacy dictates that when state law conflicts with valid federal law, the federal law is supreme. In such a situation, the state law is said to be preempted by the federal regulation.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-09 Identify the major circumstances in which federal law will preempt state law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

57) Federal regulation is considered to be officially “pervasive” when:

1.   A) Congress has given an administrative agency broad regulatory power in a particular area.

2.   B) there is literal conflict between the measures by different states.

3.   C) the state regulation is an obstacle to federal regulations.

4.   D) there is a conflict regarding a federal issue between private citizens.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The federal regulation is pervasive if Congress has “occupied the field” by regulating a subject in great breadth and/or in considerable detail. Such action by Congress may suggest an intent to displace state regulation of the subject.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-09 Identify the major circumstances in which federal law will preempt state law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

58) The central question in most federal preemption cases is:

1.   A) the intent of Congress.

2.   B) whether the federal law is supreme.

3.   C) whether due process was afforded.

4.   D) the application of the doctrine of judicial review.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The constitutional principle of federal supremacy dictates that when state law conflicts with valid federal law, the federal law is supreme. In such a situation, the state law is said to be preempted by the federal regulation. The central question in most federal preemption cases is the intent of Congress.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-09 Identify the major circumstances in which federal law will preempt state law.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

59) Under the Takings Clause, a “taking”:

1.   A) occurs when the government uses formal eminent domain procedures to condemn private property.

2.   B) can only be of land, and not of other kinds of property.

3.   C) cannot occur through government regulation that merely diminishes the value of private property.

4.   D) cannot occur by simply an invasion of private property.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The Takings Clause comes into effect when the government formally condemns land through its power of eminent domain, but it has many other applications as well. The Clause both recognizes government’s power to take private property and limits the exercise of that power. It protects other property interests besides land and interests in land. There may be a taking when the government physically invades private property. It has long been recognized that overly extensive land use regulation may so diminish the value of property or the owner’s enjoyment of it as to constitute a taking.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

60) Which of the following is a characteristic of the “Takings Clause”?

1.   A) It includes issues of property as well as the sale of goods.

2.   B) It protects the public from government intrusion onto their property.

3.   C) Private property can be taken for public use, without any reparation.

4.   D) The property owner must receive just compensation.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The Fifth Amendment states that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.” The Takings Clause both recognizes government’s power to take private property and limits the exercise of that power. It does so by requiring that when property is subjected to a governmental taking, the taking must be for a public use and the property owner must receive just compensation.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

61) Which of the following is a characteristic of government that vests the executive, legislative, and judicial powers in separate bodies?

1.   A) Separation of powers

2.   B) Federal supremacy

3.   C) Judicial review

4.   D) Checks and balances

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Separation of powers is a characteristic of government that vests the executive, legislative, and judicial powers in separate bodies.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

62) Which of the following is a fundamental principal of American government, guaranteed by the Constitution, whereby each branch has some measure of influence over the other branches and may choose to block procedures of the other branches?

1.   A) Separation of powers

2.   B) Due process

3.   C) Checks and balances

4.   D) Judicial review

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Checks and balances is a fundamental principal of American government, guaranteed by the Constitution, whereby each branch (executive, judicial, and legislative) has some measure of influence over the other branches and may choose to block procedures of the other branches.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

63) ________ of the Constitution gives the President the power to execute or enforce the laws passed by Congress.

1.   A) Article III

2.   B) Article IV

3.   C) Article V

4.   D) Article II

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Article II of the Constitution gives the president the executive power—the power to execute or enforce the laws passed by Congress.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

64) Which of the following statements about Article I of the Constitution is false?

1.   A) Article I establishes a Congress composed of a Senate and a House of Representatives.

2.   B) Article I gives Congress sole power to legislate at the federal level.

3.   C) Article I sets out rules for the enactment of legislation.

4.   D) Article I gives the judicial power of the United States to the Supreme Court and other federal courts later established by Congress.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Article III of the Constitution gives the judicial power of the United States to the Supreme Court and the other federal courts later established by Congress.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

65) The Tenth Amendment provides that those powers the Constitution neither gives to the federal government nor denies to the states are reserved to the states or the people. This is an example of:

1.   A) checks and balances.

2.   B) federalism.

3.   C) federal supremacy.

4.   D) separation of powers.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The Constitution recognizes the principle of federalism in the way it structures power relations between the federal government and the states. After listing the powers Congress holds, Article I lists certain powers that Congress cannot exercise. The Tenth Amendment provides that those powers the Constitution neither gives to the federal government nor denies to the states are reserved to the states or the people.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

66) Which of the following describes the ability of federal laws to defeat inconsistent state laws in case they conflict?

1.   A) Federal supremacy

2.   B) Separation of powers

3.   C) Federalism

4.   D) Checks and balances

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Federal supremacy is the ability of federal laws to defeat inconsistent state laws in case they conflict. This principle may cause federal statutes to preempt inconsistent state laws.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

67) ________ sets forth the procedures for amending the Constitution, which has been amended ________ times.

1.   A) Article V; 27

2.   B) Article IV; 10

3.   C) Article II; 27

4.   D) Article III; 10

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Article V sets forth the procedures for amending the Constitution. The Constitution has been amended 27 times. The first 10 of these amendments comprise the Bill of Rights.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  An Overview of the U.S. Constitution

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

68) Which of the following has become the Constitution’s main “amender” through its many interpretations of constitutional provisions?

1.   A) U.S. Supreme Court

2.   B) Attorney General

3.   C) Executive branch

4.   D) Congress

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  As a practical matter, the Supreme Court has become the Constitution’s main “amender” through its many interpretations of constitutional provisions.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Evolution of the Constitution and the Role of the Supreme Court

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

69) Which of the following are specific powers granted to Congress as outlined in Article, I, Section 8 of the Constitution?

1.   A) Police powers

2.   B) Enumerated powers

3.   C) Separation of powers

4.   D) Checks and balances

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Enumerated powers are specific powers granted to Congress as outlined in Article, I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

70) Which of the following are limits put in place by the Constitution limiting both state and federal power?

1.   A) Federalism

2.   B) Independent checks

3.   C) Checks and balances

4.   D) Separation of powers

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Independent checks are limits put in place by the Constitution limiting both state and federal power. In effect, the independent checks establish that even if Congress has an enumerated power to legislate on a particular matter or a state constitution authorizes a state to take certain actions, there still are certain protected spheres into which neither the federal government nor the state government may reach.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

71) Today, the ________ are the main limitations on congressional power.

1.   A) enumerated powers

2.   B) police powers

3.   C) separation of powers

4.   D) independent checks

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Today, the independent checks are the main limitations on congressional power. The most important reason for the decline of the enumerated powers limitation is the perceived need for active federal regulation of economic and social life.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Coverage and Structure of This Chapter

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

72) Which of the following is a broad state power to regulate for the public health, safety, morals, and welfare?

1.   A) Enumerated power

2.   B) Police power

3.   C) Independent checks

4.   D) Taxing power

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Police power is an important state legislative power that works concurrently with congressional powers to regulate for the public health, safety, morals, and welfare.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

73) Which of the following is not one of the main constitutional bases for the extensive federal social and economic regulation that exists today?

1.   A) Congressional power to regulate commerce among the states

2.   B) Congressional power to lay and collect taxes

3.   C) Congressional power to coin and borrow money

4.   D) Congressional power to spend for the general welfare

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The most important congressional powers contained in Article I, Section 8, are the powers to regulate commerce among the states, to lay and collect taxes, and to spend for the general welfare. Because they now are read broadly, these three powers are the main constitutional bases for the extensive federal social and economic regulation that exists today.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

74) Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Commerce Clause have held that it sets up three categories of actions in which Congress may engage. Which of the following is not one of those categories?

1.   A) Regulating the channels of interstate commerce

2.   B) Regulating and protecting the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, as well as persons or things in interstate commerce

3.   C) Regulating activities that substantially affect interstate commerce

4.   D) Regulating substantial intrastate commerce, regardless of whether it affected interstate commerce

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Commerce Clause have held that it sets up three categories of actions in which Congress may engage: first, regulating the channels of interstate commerce; second, regulating and protecting the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, as well as persons or things in interstate commerce; and third, regulating activities that substantially affect interstate commerce.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

75) Which of the following statements about Congress’s taxing power is true?

1.   A) The taxing power may serve as a regulatory device.

2.   B) The main purpose of the taxing power is to recoup loses spent on federal assistance programs.

3.   C) Today, the taxing power is seen as very narrow.

4.   D) The taxing power is granted in Article II of the Constitution.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  The taxing power may serve as a regulatory device. Congress may choose to regulate a disfavored activity by taxing it heavily or may opt to encourage a favored activity by lowering or eliminating a tax on it.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

76) Which of the following can Congress use to encourage states to take certain actions and thereby advance specific regulatory ends?

1.   A) Enumerated power

2.   B) Spending power

3.   C) Necessary and proper clause

4.   D) Taxing power

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  By basing the receipt of federal money on the performance of certain conditions, Congress can use the spending power to encourage states to take certain actions and thereby advance specific regulatory ends.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-01 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

77) The case in the text, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, is an example of a case where the U.S. Supreme Court analyzed the limitations of Congress’s:

1.   A) spending power.

2.   B) use of the takings clause.

3.   C) use of the Necessary and Proper clause.

4.   D) police power.

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  This case is an example of a case where the U.S. Supreme Court analyzed the limitations of Congress’s spending power under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  State and Federal Power to Regulate

Learning Objective:  03-02 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

78) In the context of determining whether a state law impermissibly burdens interstate commerce, discrimination is ________ when state laws treat local and interstate commerce unequally on their face.

1.   A) implied

2.   B) inherent

3.   C) express

4.   D) indirect

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  In determining whether a state law impermissibly burdens interstate commerce, the Supreme Court said that if a law discriminates against interstate commerce, the strictest scrutiny will be applied in the determination of the law’s constitutionality. Discrimination is express when state laws treat local and interstate commerce unequally on their face.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-08 Explain the burden-on-commerce doctrine’s role in making certain state government actions unconstitutional.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

79) Which of the following is not one of the reasons why federal preemption of a state law generally occurs?

1.   A) There is a literal conflict between the state and federal measures, so that it is impossible to follow both simultaneously.

2.   B) The federal law specifically states that it will preempt state regulation in certain areas.

3.   C) The federal law was enacted before the state law.

4.   D) The federal regulation is persuasive.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Whether the federal law was enacted first is irrelevant for federal preemption cases.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-09 Identify the major circumstances in which federal law will preempt state law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

80) Which of the following is a governmental power whereby the government can take or condemn private property for a public purpose on the payment of just compensation?

1.   A) Eminent domain

2.   B) Police power

3.   C) Spending power

4.   D) Enumerated power

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Eminent domain is a governmental power whereby the government can take or condemn private property for a public purpose on the payment of just compensation.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

81) Which of the following occurs when an overly extensive land use restriction diminishes the value of property as to constitute a taking?

1.   A) Regulatory taking

2.   B) Physical invasion taking

3.   C) Necessary and proper taking

4.   D) Condemnation taking

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  It has long been recognized that overly extensive land use regulation may so diminish the value of property or the owner’s enjoyment of it as to constitute a taking. Among the factors courts consider in such “regulatory taking” cases are the degree to which government deprives the owner of free possession, use, and disposition of his property; the overall economic impact of the regulation on the owner; and how much the regulation interferes with the owner’s reasonable investment-backed expectations regarding the future use of the property.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

82) In the case discussed in the text, Kelo v. City of New London, the plaintiff challenged whether:

1.   A) the land-use restriction constituted a taking.

2.   B) his type of property was subject to the Takings Clause.

3.   C) he received just compensation for the taking of his property.

4.   D) the government’s taking was for a public use.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  In this case, the plaintiff challenged whether the government’s taking was for a public use, as required by the Fifth Amendment: “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

83) Which of the following is the basic test used to determine “just compensation,” as required by the Takings Clause?

1.   A) The fair market value of the property at the time of the taking plus any equity the owner has accumulated

2.   B) The fair market value of the property at the time of purchase

3.   C) The fair market value of the property at the time of the taking

4.   D) The original purchase price of the property plus any incidental costs for relocating

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Although the standards for determining just compensation vary with the circumstances, the basic test is the fair market value of the property (or of the lost property right) at the time of the taking.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

84) Which of the following statements about government action is false?

1.   A) The government action requirement forces courts to distinguish between governmental behavior and private behavior.

2.   B) Private behavior will constitute state action where a government unit is directly responsible for the challenged private behavior because it has coerced such behavior.

3.   C) Government regulation and government funding have become increasingly more important factors in government action determinations.

4.   D) Most of the Constitution’s individual rights provisions block only the actions of government bodies, federal, state, and local.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Government regulation and government funding have become somewhat less important factors in government action or state action determinations.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-03 Describe the incorporation doctrine’s role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

85) Which of the following is a principle allowing courts to protect certain rights deemed fundamental from government interference, even where procedural protections are present or where those rights are not specifically mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution?

1.   A) Procedural due process

2.   B) Substantive due process

3.   C) Equal protection

4.   D) Federalism

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Substantive due process is a principle allowing courts to protect certain rights deemed fundamental from government interference, even where procedural protections are present or where those rights are not specifically mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

86) Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

 

Answer:The traditional conception of due process, called procedural due process, establishes the procedures that government must follow when it takes life, liberty, or property. Although the requirements of procedural due process vary from situation to situation, their core idea is that one is entitled to adequate notice of the government action to be taken against him and to some sort of fair trial or hearing before that action can occur. Procedural due process does not challenge rules of substantive law—the rules that set standards of behavior for organized social life. In contrast, substantive due process is a principle allowing courts to protect certain rights deemed fundamental from government interference, even where procedural protections are present or where those rights are not specifically mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

 

87) Mark, an untenured Assistant Professor of Business Law at a public university, is fired from his job for supposedly misbehaving with students in class. Since the firing took place without any kind of hearing, Mark wants to challenge it on procedural due process grounds. Will Mark’s claim succeed? Assume that the university did not publicize the reasons for Mark’s discharge, and will not tell anyone why he was discharged.

 

Answer:  The Supreme Court has said that procedural due process property is not created by the Constitution but by existing rules and understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law. These rules and understandings must give a person a legitimate claim of entitlement to a benefit, not merely some need, desire, or expectation for it. This definition includes almost all of the usual forms of property, as well as utility service, disability benefits, welfare benefits, and a driver’s license. It also includes the job rights of tenured public employees who can be discharged only for cause, but not the rights of untenured or probationary employees. Therefore, Mark’s claim will have a hard time succeeding because he almost certainly has not been deprived of a liberty or property interest. He lacked a property interest because he did not have tenure. He probably lacked a liberty interest because the university did not publicize the reasons for his discharge and thus (in theory) did not harm his reputation and his future employment opportunities.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Independent Checks on the Federal Government and the States

Learning Objective:  03-06 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

 

 

88) A state passes a minimum wage law. Fred Whitby, President of Unisys Corporation, is certain that it is unconstitutional. For example, Fred argues that the Constitution’s Contract Clause plainly renders the law unconstitutional. Is Fred right? Why or why not?

 

Answer:  Fred’s Contract Clause argument cannot work as to employment contracts made after the law’s passage, because the Contract Clause only checks laws that impair the obligations of existing contracts. Even in this case, it has rarely, if ever, been an obstacle to minimum wage laws.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-07 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government action triggers more rigorous scrutiny than the rational basis test.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

 

89) State a situation where state law is preempted by federal regulation.

 

Answer:  The constitutional principle of federal supremacy dictates that when state law conflicts with valid federal law, the federal law is supreme. In such a situation, the state law is said to be preempted by the federal regulation. When there is a literal conflict between the state and federal measures and it is impossible to follow both simultaneously, this results in federal preemption of state law.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Independent Checks Applying Only to the States

Learning Objective:  03-09 Identify the major circumstances in which federal law will preempt state law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

 

90) Under what two conditions is a governmental taking of property unconstitutional? Should both of these conditions be satisfied in order for a taking to offend the constitution, or is only one condition necessary enough?

 

Answer:  The Takings Clause both recognizes government’s power to take private property and limits the exercise of that power. It does so by requiring that when property is subjected to a governmental taking, the taking must be for a public use and the property owner must receive just compensation. Either condition will make a taking unconstitutional by itself.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Takings Clause

Learning Objective:  03-10 Explain the power granted to the government by the Takings Clause, as well as the limits on that power.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

 

Business Law, 17e (Langvardt)

Chapter 5   Criminal Law and Procedure

 

1) Special deterrence occurs when punishment of a wrongdoer deters other persons from committing similar offenses.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Special deterrence occurs when punishment of an offender deters him/her from committing further crimes. In contrast, general deterrence results when punishment of a wrongdoer deters other persons from committing similar offenses.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

2) When Congress created the U.S. Sentencing Commission and charged it with creating the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Congress sought (among other things) to decrease judicial discretion in sentencing.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The guidelines were created with a view to reducing judicial discretion in sentencing and minimizing disparities among sentences imposed on defendants who committed the same offenses.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

3) When a judge’s sentencing decision is challenged on appeal, the governing standard will be one of reasonableness.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In the 2005 United States v. Booker case, the Supreme Court stated that when a judge’s sentencing decision is challenged on appeal, the governing standard will be one of reasonableness.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

4) The U.S. Constitution allows ex post facto criminal laws.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The U.S. Constitution prohibits ex post facto criminal laws. This means that a defendant’s act must have been prohibited by statute at the time he/she committed it and that the penalty imposed must be the one provided for at the time of his/her offense.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

5) Crimes are private wrongs.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Crimes are public wrongs—acts prohibited by the state or federal government. In contrast, torts are private wrongs.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

6) Obscene expression receives no First Amendment protection.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Supreme Court has established that obscene expression receive no First Amendment protection.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-02 Explain why the First Amendment may sometimes serve as a defense to criminal liability.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

7) The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishments.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Constitution limits the type of punishment imposed on those convicted. The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishments in criminal cases.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-03 Identify the constitutional provisions at issue when a criminal law is challenged as being excessively vague.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

8) The Equal Protection Clause prevents states and the federal government from enacting criminal laws that discriminate against different classes of persons.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits criminal statutes that discriminatorily treat certain persons of the same class or arbitrarily discriminate among different classes of persons.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-03 Identify the constitutional provisions at issue when a criminal law is challenged as being excessively vague.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

9) Voluntary intoxication usually serves as a complete defense to criminal liability.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Voluntary intoxication does not serve as a complete defense to criminal liability although it may decrease the degree of a defendant’s responsibility.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-04 Identify the standard of proof that the government must meet in a criminal prosecution, as well as the constitutional sources of that requirement.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

10) In the United States, a defendant in a criminal case is presumed innocent.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Defendants in criminal cases are presumed innocent until proven guilty. This is called the presumption of innocence.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-04 Identify the standard of proof that the government must meet in a criminal prosecution, as well as the constitutional sources of that requirement.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

11) At a preliminary hearing, the prosecutor must prove his case by the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  At a preliminary hearing, the prosecutor must provide enough evidence to persuade a magistrate that there is probable cause to believe the accused committed a felony.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-05 Identify the major steps in a criminal prosecution.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

12) The language of the Bill of Rights only refers to actions of the federal government so the protections of the Bill of Rights do not apply to state government actions.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Although the literal language of the Bill of Rights refers only to federal government actions, the U.S. Supreme Court has applied the most important Bill of Rights guarantees to state government actions by “selectively incorporating” those guarantees into the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process protection.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-05 Identify the major steps in a criminal prosecution.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

13) Owners of commercial property enjoy greater privacy expectations in their property for Fourth Amendment purposes than do owners of residential property.

 

Answer:FALSE

Explanation:  The protection enjoyed by owners of residential property under the Fourth Amendment is far greater than that enjoyed by owners of commercial property. In O’Connor v. Ortega, the Supreme Court ruled that alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment in the realm of commercial property need to be studied on a case-by-case basis.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-06 Describe the basic protections afforded by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

14) Officers may conduct a warrantless search of an individual at the time of an arrest.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Officers may conduct a warrantless search of an arrestee, the items in his/her possession and items within their control. This is called a search incident to lawful arrest and is used to protect an officer while also protecting potential evidence.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-07 Describe major exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s usual requirement that the government have a warrant before conducting a search.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

15) During a Terry stop, officers may not conduct a pat-down search of an individual without a warrant.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  During a Terry stop, the Supreme Court has held that the Fourth Amendment permits officers to conduct a pat-down search of the detained person in order to determine if that individual is carrying a weapon that could endanger the officers.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-07 Describe major exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s usual requirement that the government have a warrant before conducting a search.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

16) Under the USA PATRIOT Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court (FISA Court) may issue warrants of the “sneak and peek” variety.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court can issue the “sneak and peek” warrants where the FBI need not produce the warrant for the property owner or possessor to see and need not notify an absent property owner or possessor that the search took place.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-08 Explain what the exclusionary rule is.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

17) The Fifth Amendment prevents the government from coercing a defendant into making incriminating statements and thereby assisting his own prosecution.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The Fifth Amendment protects against compelled testimonial self-incrimination by establishing that “[n]o person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” This provision prevents the government from coercing a defendant into making incriminating statements and thereby assisting in his/her own prosecution.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-09 List the components of the Miranda warnings and state when law enforcement officers must give those warnings.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

18) In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court mandated that police officers have to give suspects a warning about their rights.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In its decision in Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court established procedural requirements to safeguard the Fifth Amendment by requiring police to inform criminal suspects of their rights prior to an interrogation.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-09 List the components of the Miranda warnings and state when law enforcement officers must give those warnings.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

19) The Fifth Amendment guarantees indigent defendants the right to court-appointed counsel.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The Sixth Amendment has been interpreted to mean not only that the accused in a criminal case may employ his/her own attorney but also that an indigent criminal defendant is entitled to court-appointed counsel.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  05-06 Describe the basic protections afforded by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

20) Through the concept of agency, a corporation’s higher level corporate officials may be held criminally liable even in the absence of proof that they ordered the criminal acts.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  It may be impossible to demonstrate that any higher-level corporate official had sufficient knowledge to constitute mens rea. Recognizing this problem, the federal courts have adopted a general rule that a corporation may be criminally liable for the actions of any of its agents, regardless of whether any link between the agents and higher level corporate officials can be demonstrated.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  White-Collar Crimes and the Dilemmas of Corporate Control

Learning Objective:  05-06 Describe the basic protections afforded by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

21) A(n) ________ is a serious crime such as murder, sexual assault, arson, drug-dealing, or a theft or fraud offense of sufficient magnitude.

1.   A) misdemeanor

2.   B) felony

3.   C) tort

4.   D) infraction

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  A felony is a serious crime such as murder, sexual assault, arson, drug-dealing, or a theft or fraud offense of sufficient magnitude. Felonies are punishable by lengthy confinement of the convicted offender to a penitentiary, as well as by a fine.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

22) Quasi-criminal infractions:

1.   A) involve significant moral culpability on the offender’s part.

2.   B) are not punishable by fines.

3.   C) are a serious crime.

4.   D) are not punishable by confinement in jail.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Depending on their seriousness and potential for harm to the public, traffic violations are classified either as misdemeanors or as less serious infractions. Really only quasi-criminal, infractions usually are punishable by fines but not by confinement in jail.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

23) ________ believe that prevention of socially undesirable behavior is the only proper purpose of criminal penalties.

1.   A) Utilitarians

2.   B) Ethical pragmatists

3.   C) Virtue ethicists

4.   D) Deontologists

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Persons accepting the utilitarian view believe that prevention of socially undesirable behavior is the only proper purpose of criminal penalties. This prevention goal includes three major components: deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

24) What is recidivism?

1.   A) A special theory of deterrence

2.   B) A quasi-criminal offense punishable by light fines

3.   C) Repeat offenses by previously punished offenders

4.   D) Attempts to change the behavior of convicted offenders

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Recidivism is the phenomenon of repeat offenses by previously punished offenders.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

25) ________ is the change in the attitudes or values of convicted offenders so that they are not inclined to commit future offenses.

1.   A) Recidivism

2.   B) Rehabilitation

3.   C) Retribution

4.   D) Probation

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Rehabilitation of convicted offenders involves changing their attitudes or values so that they are not inclined to commit future offenses. It serves as a way to prevent undesirable behavior.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

26) ________ is effectively a conditional sentence that suspends the usual imprisonment and/or fine if the offender “toes the line” and meets other judicially imposed conditions for the period specified by the court.

1.   A) Probation

2.   B) Retribution

3.   C) Prevention

4.   D) Rehabilitation

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Probation is effectively a conditional sentence that suspends the usual imprisonment and/or fine if the offender “toes the line” and meets other judicially imposed conditions for the period specified by the court. It is sometimes granted to first-time offenders and other convicted defendants deemed suitable candidates by the court.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

27) According to the law, crimes are statutory offenses; this essentially means that:

1.   A) it must be proved that the crime is dangerous or detrimental to society.

2.   B) a behavior is not a crime unless Congress or a state legislature has criminalized it.

3.   C) the prevention of crime should include deterrence and rehabilitation.

4.   D) courts may assess punitive damages in order to punish the wrongdoer.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Crimes are statutory offenses. A given behavior is not a crime unless Congress or a state legislature has criminalized it.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

28) A defendant’s act must have been prohibited by statute at the time he/she committed it and the penalty imposed must be the one provided for at the time of his/her offense. This essentially indicates:

1.   A) encouragement of deterrence laws.

2.   B) the presence of nulla poena sine lege

3.   C) prohibition of ex post facto criminal laws.

4.   D) the presence of retributive justice.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The U.S. Constitution prohibits ex post facto criminal laws. This means that a defendant’s act must have been prohibited by statute at the time he/she committed it and that the penalty imposed must be the one provided for at the time of his/her offense.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-01 Describe the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

29) The First Amendment limits governmental power to enact and enforce criminal laws by prohibiting:

1.   A) warrantless searches.

2.   B) arbitrary discrimination among different classes of people.

3.   C) cruel and unusual punishments.

4.   D) laws that unreasonably restrict freedom of speech.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  By prohibiting laws that unreasonably restrict freedom of speech, the First Amendment plays a major role in limiting governmental power to enact and enforce criminal laws.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-02 Explain why the First Amendment may sometimes serve as a defense to criminal liability.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

30) Commercial speech receives which form of protection under the First Amendment?

1.   A) Intermediate protection

2.   B) Full constitutional protection

3.   C) Minimal protection

4.   D) No protection

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Commercial speech receives a less substantial First Amendment shield known as “intermediate” protection.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-02 Explain why the First Amendment may sometimes serve as a defense to criminal liability.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

31) The ________ Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishments.

1.   A) First

2.   B) Eighth

3.   C) Fourteenth

4.   D) Fifteenth

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishments. This prohibition furnishes, for example, the constitutional basis for judicial decisions establishing limits on imposition of the death penalty.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-03 Identify the constitutional provisions at issue when a criminal law is challenged as being excessively vague.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

32) The Equal Protection Clause is derived from which amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

1.   A) First

2.   B) Fourteenth

3.   C) Tenth

4.   D) Second

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The Equal Protection Clause comes from the Fourteenth Amendment and prohibits criminal statutes that discriminatorily treat certain persons of the same class or arbitrarily discriminate among different classes of persons.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  Role of the Criminal Law

Learning Objective:  05-03 Identify the constitutional provisions at issue when a criminal law is challenged as being excessively vague.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business and Administrative Communication A Locker 12th Edition – Test Bank

Crafting and Executing Strategy The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts Arthur Thompson 22nd Edition- Test Bank

Experience Human Development 13Th Edition By Diane Papalia – Test Bank