Business Law with UCC Applications Paul Sukys 15th Edition – Test Bank

 

To Purchase this Complete Test Bank with Answers Click the link Below

 

https://tbzuiqe.com/product/business-law-with-ucc-applications-paul-sukys-15th-edition-test-bank/

 

If face any problem or Further information contact us At tbzuiqe@gmail.com

 

 

Sample Test

Business Law with UCC Applications, 15e (Sukys)

Chapter 3   The Judicial Process and Cyber-procedure

 

1) A predicate offense is generally one that provides the resources needed to commit the offenses outlined in the statute.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In the Opening Case—Round 1 “The European Community v. RJR Nabisco:

Euros and RICO and Nations … Oh My!” the text defines predicate offense as one that provides the resources needed to commit the offenses outlined in the new statute. For example, racketeering, as laid out in RICO, includes money laundering as a predicate offense. Congress defines money laundering to include extraterritorial activities. Therefore, Congress intended money laundering to have an extraterritorial application in RICO.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-01 Explain the fundamental nature of the American courts.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

2) A state court that has the power to hear immigration cases is a court of special jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Only federal courts with special jurisdiction have the power to hear certain types of cases such as immigration cases, or bankruptcy cases. Examples of state courts with special jurisdiction include probate courts and family courts.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

3) A federal question can only involve a treaty.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  A federal question can involve a treaty, the U.S. Constitution, or a federal statute.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

4) Appellate courts use the abuse of discretion standard to determine whether a judge in the lower court has, in some way, misused his or her authority.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Courts use the abuse of discretion standard to determine whether the judge in the lower court has, in some way, misused his or her authority. The clearly erroneous standard is used when an appeals court determines that the decision made in the lower court was undeniably wrong, given the facts and evidence in the case.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

5) Plenary review jurisdiction in federal court can only arise in cases of diversity, even though there is no federal law is involved.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Plenary review refers to the power of appellate courts to determine whether errors of law have been committed in a lower court. Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two types of cases—those involving federal law and those involving diversity.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

6) The U.S. federal court system is divided into 13 circuits.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  The U.S. federal court system is divided into 13 circuits, including the Washington, D.C. and federal circuits. Each circuit has several district courts.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

7) In federal subject matter jurisdiction cases, the plaintiff must allege at least $75,000 in damages.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  No, the $75,000 amount applies only in federal diversity cases. To have diversity jurisdiction in federal court, a corporation is considered a citizen of the state where it is incorporated and where it has its principal place of business. If even one defendant is a citizen of the same state as one of the plaintiffs, diversity cannot be established. In such a case, the law says that “diversity is not complete.”

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

8) The text of the U.S. Constitution gives the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction in a case in which a state is a party.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases affecting ambassadors or other public ministers and consuls, and in cases in which a state is a party.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-03 Recognize those cases that can be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

9) State trial courts are known as limited jurisdiction courts.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The state trial courts, also known as general jurisdiction courts, have the power to hear any type of case. They are often called superior courts, circuit courts, or courts of common pleas.

Difficulty: 1 Easy

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Remember

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

10) In the Nicastro v. McIntyre (2010) case, the New Jersey Supreme Court applied the principle of diversity of citizenship to determine liability of the defendant.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court embraced a new theory of jurisdiction, the stream of commerce test. Under the stream of commerce test, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the defendant sent one of its products into “the stream of commerce” based on the manufacturer’s plan of national distribution.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

11) The decisions of state supreme courts are final unless a federal issue or a constitutional right is involved.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  If a federal issue or constitutional right is involved, the case may be appealed or removed to a federal court.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

12) A plaintiff is a person who answers a lawsuit by filing a demurrer in a trial court of general jurisdiction.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The defendant—not the plaintiff—can file one or more pre-answer motions, including a dismissal of the case for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, also called a demurrer in some states.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

13) A complaint is served by the plaintiff directly on the defendant. This is called service of process.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  The complaint sets forth the names of the parties to the lawsuit, identifying them as plaintiffs or defendants. The complaint is “served” on the defendant by a process server, generally a county official, such as a sheriff deputy or constable.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

14) A demurrer is a plaintiff’s response asking a court to dismiss the defendant’s answer because she has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  A demurrer is a motion (a legal request) by a defendant—not a plaintiff—which asks a court to dismiss a plaintiff’s case because she has failed to state a legal claim for which a relief (remedy) can be granted.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

15) The defendant’s answer may state an affirmative defense, such as assumption of the risk.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Assumption of the risk is a set of circumstances that indicate that the defendant should not be held liable, even if the plaintiff proves all of the facts in the complaint.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

16) Having been called for jury selection, Lawrence discovered that the defendant in the trial is the brother of his stockbroker. The lawyers may not refuse to impanel Lawrence because to do so would subject the court to a civil rights lawsuit.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Prospective jurors may be rejected if they are unable to render an impartial judgment. One reason for rejecting a prospective juror is if he or she had a personal relationship with the litigant or with a witness.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

17) Jury instructions contain the judge’s opinion of the evidence presented.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Because juries comprise many people who are not familiar with particular aspects of the law, someone must explain the law to the jury. The judge’s instructions explain the rules of law that the jurors are to apply to the facts in reaching their decision.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

18) If Joe sues Marie as the result of a contract dispute, Marie can request that Joe undergo a physical examination.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Such requests can be made only if the physical or mental condition of the party is in controversy; it must be a central concern to the lawsuit.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-06 List the most common discovery techniques.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

19) Cyber-jurisdiction is the power of the court to have personal jurisdiction over any type of case based on the stream of commerce standard.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Not necessarily. The stream of commerce test announced in the Nicastro v. McIntyre case, is limited to products and product liability. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant manufacturer sent one of its products into “the stream of commerce” using a plan of national distribution that the manufacturer knew or at least reasonably should have known would, in some way, impact New Jersey.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Cyber-procedure

Learning Objective:  03-08 Determine the extent of cyber-jurisdiction.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

20) Formal criminal charges may be brought against a defendant in state court without a grand jury being involved.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  In the United States, formal charges against the defendant in state court may be brought either by indictment or by information. Some states do not have a grand jury system and therefore, can bring formal charges only by information.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-10 Describe the steps in a criminal prosecution.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

21) Joe, a resident of Ohio, and Maria, a resident of New Mexico, have an auto accident in New Mexico and the damages are $35,000. Based on this information, a federal court:

1.   A) would not intervene because Ohio and New Mexico have different laws regarding this type of accident.

2.   B) would intervene because there is a federal question concerning whether an auto title was involved.

3.   C) would not have jurisdiction over this case because the amount in controversy is less than $75,000.

4.   D) would have jurisdiction over this case because the amount in controversy is over $15,000.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  For a federal court to have diversity jurisdiction in this case, both parties must reside in different states and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

22) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was established by Congress primarily to:

1.   A) hear appeals on questions of law from the lower courts.

2.   B) streamline and unify patent law.

3.   C) decide on the details involved in bringing a case to trial.

4.   D) simplify issues and avoid unnecessary arguments and surprises in the subsequent trial.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  However, in addition to patent law, the Federal Circuit was also given the power to hear appeals in cases that entail government contracts, trademark disputes, federal workers, veterans’ benefits and international trade, among others.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

23) The United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in which of the following cases?

1.   A) Cases in which an ambassador is a party

2.   B) Cases appealed from state supreme courts

3.   C) Cases in which public ministers and consuls are parties

4.   D) Cases in which a state is a party

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Although the U.S. Supreme Court is the court of final jurisdiction in the United States, not every case can or will be heard by the court. The Court has original jurisdiction in cases affecting ambassadors or other public ministers and consuls, or in cases in which a state is a party. In cases where the Court does not have original jurisdiction, the Court will hear a case only if it issues a writofcertiorari, which is an order to a lower court to deliver its records to the Supreme Court.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-03 Recognize those cases that can be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

24) Courts with the power to hear any type of case are courts with ________ jurisdiction.

1.   A) unlimited

2.   B) special

3.   C) general

4.   D) subject matter

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  These are usually the trial courts of a state court system, although lower courts—such as municipal courts—have limited or special jurisdiction over certain matters established by statute.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

25) Probate courts and courts of claims are examples of courts with ________ jurisdiction.

1.   A) special

2.   B) subject matter

3.   C) personal

4.   D) general

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Courts of special jurisdiction are found in both state and federal court systems. In the federal system, tax and immigration courts are courts of special or limited jurisdiction.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

26) Gordon Gibbs accidentally grated his plow along his neighbor’s driveway, ruining the driveway. The neighbor wants Gordon to pay the $1,500 cost of paving the driveway. If this case enters litigation, it will most likely be heard by ________ court.

1.   A) a federal

2.   B) the state supreme

3.   C) a family

4.   D) a small-claims

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Many states have created small-claims courts that have jurisdiction to hear cases involving smaller dollar amounts—often up to $10,000—depending on state statute.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

27) When a party (the movant) files a motion for ________, the movant is telling the court that no ________ exists, and that the movant is entitled by law to ________.

1.   A) discovery; further discovery; a verdict in his favor

2.   B) a counter claim; genuine issue of material fact; a favorable judgment

3.   C) summary judgment; genuine issue of material fact; a favorable judgment

4.   D) an affirmative defense; further testimony; dismiss the other party’s case

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  When a party (the movant) files a motion for summary judgment, the movant is telling the court that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and that the movant is entitled by law to a favorable judgment. Motions for summary judgment must be filed with supporting legal arguments written out in a brief and accompanied by applicable supporting evidence.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

28) ________ occurs when a plaintiff searches for a(n) ________ with law that is favorable to its case, and then files the case.

1.   A) Forum shopping; affirmative action jurisdiction

2.   B) Demurrer; jurisdiction

3.   C) Forum shopping; class action lawsuit

4.   D) Forum shopping; jurisdiction

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  Forum shopping occurs when a plaintiff searches for a jurisdiction with law that is favorable to its case, and then files the case in that jurisdiction. The defendant has many options available to him or her, including—if he or she can meet federal jurisdiction criteria—filing a motion to remove a case filed in state court to federal court.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

29) A credit card company has cheated one million cardholders out of 50 cents each. Marlene, one of the defrauded cardholders, wants to sue the credit card company but should attempt to:

1.   A) approach the legislature for special suit legislation.

2.   B) approach the U.S. Supreme Court to grant original jurisdiction.

3.   C) bring a petition to the Congress signed by the cardholders.

4.   D) bring a class action suit.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  The courts will permit a class action lawsuit provided that (1) it is not feasible for the members of the group to bring the action on their own; (2) the members of the group share common questions of law that can be tried together; and (3) the class action approach is far better than forcing the plaintiffs to file separate actions.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

30) Cross-examination of the prosecution’s witness is usually conducted by the ________ during the ________.

1.   A) defense attorney, prosecution’s case in chief.

2.   B) defense attorney; voir dire

3.   C) judge; plaintiff’s case in chief

4.   D) defense attorney; closing statements

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Generally the defense attorney subjects the prosecutor’s witnesses to cross-examination.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

31) Joe signed a promissory note for $5,000 to cover the cost of roofing repairs by Acme Roofing Company. Acme transferred the note to Big Bank who sued Joe when he failed to pay the note. Joe believes that Acme did not do the repairs properly. If Joe wants to bring Acme into court, then Joe’s answer should contain a:

1.   A) counterclaim against Acme.

2.   B) cross-claim against Acme.

3.   C) third-party complaint against Acme.

4.   D) new lawsuit against Acme.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  A third-party complaint is a lawsuit (within the original lawsuit) by the defendant against a third party not yet named in the lawsuit.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

32) During the ________ of the jury, ________ the right to ask questions to determine who will allowed to sit on the jury.

1.   A) discovery; only the judge has

2.   B) voirdire; both parties have

3.   C) discovery; either party has

4.   D) voirdire; only the plaintiff has

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  The process of voirdire (to speak the truth) occurs when lawyers for both parties question prospective jurors to determine how impartial they can be, and whether they will be allowed to sit on the jury.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

33) An equitable remedy may be available in all of the following cases except:

1.   A) specific performance.

2.   B) damages.

3.   C) an injunction.

4.   D) a restraining order.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Equitable remedies are available when monetary damages cannot adequately provide relief and usually require a party to do (or not do) something.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

34) Attorney Jose wants to personally question Ellen, a witness, about her observation of an auto accident in advance of a trial concerning the accident. Jose should:

1.   A) send Ellen interrogatories.

2.   B) take Ellen’s deposition.

3.   C) ask Ellen to produce tangible evidence.

4.   D) issue a summons for Ellen to appear in court in advance of the trial.

 

Answer:  B

Explanation:  Depositions are oral statements made out of court under oath by witnesses or parties to the action in response to questions from the opposing attorneys.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-06 List the most common discovery techniques.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

35) Interrogatories:

1.   A) are made to secure a statement from a party that a particular fact is true.

2.   B) ask a party to undergo a physical or a mental examination.

3.   C) are written questions that must be answered in writing, under oath, by the opposite party.

4.   D) ask a party to produce documents, records, accounts, photographs, or other tangible evidence.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Interrogatories are written questions that must be answered in writing under oath by the opposite party. Interrogatories cannot be given to witnesses. Only plaintiffs and defendants can be required to answer interrogatories.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-06 List the most common discovery techniques.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

36) Ignacio wins a monetary judgment at trial, but is denied an award of attorney’s fees. The losing party, Salazar, acts to challenge the adverse trial court decision before an appellate court. Ignacio also wants to appeal the denial of attorney’s fees. Ignacio should file a:

1.   A) cross-claim.

2.   B) motion for summary judgment.

3.   C) cross-appeal.

4.   D) counterclaim.

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  It is also possible that the party that prevailed at trial may wish to file an appeal. This step is referred to as a cross-appeal. Generally, an appeal is filed by the party who lost at trial. However, as in this case, the prevailing party may also file a cross-appeal for denial of attorney’s fees.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-07 Detail the nature of an appeal.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

37) Courts with appellate jurisdiction are empowered to determine whether the lower courts have made errors of law using the ________ standard.

1.   A) plenary review

2.   B) clearly erroneous

3.   C) abuse of discretion

4.   D) denovo review

 

Answer:  A

Explanation:  Plenary review is the process appellate courts used to determine whether the lower courts have made errors of law. In cases where appellate courts review findings of fact and evidence, the clearly erroneous standard is applied.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-07 Detail the nature of an appeal.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

38) ________ is the power of the court to hear a case based on Internet-related transactions.

1.   A) Science jurisdiction

2.   B) General jurisdiction

3.   C) Cyber-jurisdiction

4.   D) Subject matter jurisdiction

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  Cyber-jurisdiction (AKA electronic jurisdiction and e-jurisdiction) is the power of the court to hear a case based on Internet-related transactions.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Cyber-procedure

Learning Objective:  03-08 Determine the extent of cyber-jurisdiction.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

39) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure now refer to computerized evidence as:

1.   A) electronic lockbox.

2.   B) electronic data interchange.

3.   C) e-commerce.

4.   D) electronically stored information.

 

Answer:  D

Explanation:  ESI is embedded in many diverse and mysterious formats, making its retrieval difficult for most attorneys. Attorneys especially must pay close attention to all aspects of ESI, including its preservation, storage, and communication. These ESIs can be requested and subpoenaed during discovery and trial.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Cyber-procedure

Learning Objective:  03-09 Explain the nature of electronically stored information (ESI).

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

40) During a(n) ________, the defendant is formally charged with a crime and can either plead guilty or not guilty.

1.   A) indictment

2.   B) preliminary hearing

3.   C) arraignment

4.   D) initial appearance

 

Answer:  C

Explanation:  The arraignment is a formal court proceeding during which the defendant, after hearing the indictment or information read, pleads either guilty or not guilty. Normally, the defendant pleads not guilty and the case moves on to trial.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-10 Describe the steps in a criminal prosecution.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

41) Jill, a resident of Iowa, suffers $20,000 in damages when a BIG Corp. truck hits her parked car in Illinois, where Jill is visiting her aunt. BIG Corp. is incorporated in Delaware. In what court may her suit be filed?

 

Answer:  Jill may sue either in Illinois state court (where the accident occurred) or in Delaware state court (where BIG is incorporated), but not in a federal court since diversity jurisdiction requires more than $75,000 be in controversy, and there are no federal statutes in this problem to confer federal question jurisdiction.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

42) Hundreds of residents of Rosewood County in Pennsylvania have filed a lawsuit in state court against Thompson Brothers, a New York-based homebuilder, concerning the completion of Thompson’s newly-built apartment facility. Fearing the hostility of a Pennsylvanian jury, Thompson is considering removing the case to federal court. Discuss.

 

Answer:  The case is an example of a class action lawsuit, where a few plaintiffs file a lawsuit on behalf of an entire class. For purposes of diversity jurisdiction in federal court, if Thompson can show it is a corporate resident with New York as its “nerve center” or principal place of business, both parties are from different states. However, for complete diversity, damages must be over $75,000. If the apartment facility or damages claimed by the plaintiffs are less than $75,000, the case is likely to be tried before a Pennsylvanian jury in a state court. If the damages are over $75,000, Thompson most likely will be able to remove the case to federal court based on diversity.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-02 Determine when a case can be brought in federal court.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

43) Joe wants to sue directly in his state’s Supreme Court (a state in which the Supreme Court is the highest court), since his suit involves a question of genetic testing that has never been heard by a trial court of general jurisdiction in Joe’s state. Can Joe sue directly in his state’s Supreme Court? Explain.

 

Answer:  Joe cannot sue directly in the state’s Supreme Court because the state’s trial court exercises general jurisdiction. The state Supreme Court is an appellate court that only reviews the record created by the trial court.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  The Court System

Learning Objective:  03-04 Identify the structure of most state court systems.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

44) Samantha sues Acme Chemical Co. in a federal court for injuries caused five years ago by the application of a residential pesticide produced by Acme. The state statute of limitations (time to bring lawsuits) in Samantha’s state is three years. Samantha wants the federal court to apply a longer four-year federal statute of limitations. How will the federal court resolve this question?

 

Answer:  Generally, the state statute of limitations applies to this case. Defendant Acme should file a demurrer or motion to dismiss based on the expiration of the statute of limitations.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

45) Sue wants to sell products on the Internet, but is concerned that she might be sued in a distant state by a dissatisfied customer. How might Sue best design a website to avoid this possibility?

 

Answer:  Courts now use the sliding scale standard to determine personal jurisdiction. Active websites which facilitate cyber sales and payments create minimum contacts and jurisdiction in the customer’s state. To mitigate her exposure, the terms and conditions of doing business with Sue on her website must include dispute resolution (venue, mediation, etc.) since Sue is intending to sell via her website (a passive website is not relevant) avoiding personal jurisdiction.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Cyber-procedure

Learning Objective:  03-08 Determine the extent of cyber-jurisdiction.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

46) Each month for the past three years, Carol has been overcharged 50 cents by ABC Cell Phone Corporation. She has good reason to believe that tens of thousands of other individuals have also been defrauded of 50 cents each. Carol wants to sue, but the expense of bringing a lawsuit for 50 cents is too great. What can Carol do to obtain a judicial hearing of her complaint?

 

Answer:  A class action lawsuit with Carol as the representative party is possible if they all share a single, similar injury. Class action suits are allowed provided that (1) it is not feasible for the members of the group to bring a suit on their own, (2) the members of the group share common questions of law that can be tried together, and (3) the class action approach is far better than forcing the plaintiffs to file separate actions. Such would appear to be true in this problem.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

47) Marilyn is a contractor-computer programmer who works for SIM Co. in its principal place of business in New Jersey. Marilyn designs a corporate information system (CIS) for Matrix Corp., a SIM Co. client, which has its offices in New York City. Unfortunately, the CIS crashes before Marilyn is paid for her work and all of Matrix’s records are lost, requiring Matrix to spend $300,000 to reconstruct the system. Matrix sues SIM Co. for breach of contract. Marilyn believes that the crash was not caused by her CIS and that she should be paid by SIM Co. Discuss the options Marilyn and SIM Co. have in responding to the suit.

 

Answer:  SIM Co. can file a counter-claim against Matrix and file a third-party complaint against Marilyn for breach of contract. Marilyn can file a cross-claim against SIM Co. for lack of payment.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

48) Sheena was flying New York Airlines to Florida via a stop in Richmond, Virginia. However, the flight was delayed by ten hours at the Richmond airport and later cancelled, with no refund or alternate flights for the passengers. As a result, Sheena was forced to breach a $100,000 contract with a Florida client. Sheena files a lawsuit against New York Airlines and the Richmond airport for causing inconvenience during transit and for monetary loss. In response to her lawsuit, New York Airlines acknowledges the inconvenience caused but cross-claimed that the Richmond airport did not allow the connecting flight to land, hence the cancellation. Richmond defended the cancellation based on extreme weather conditions. Analyze the situation.

 

Answer:  New York Airlines cross-claimed Richmond, who responded with an affirmative defense to Sheena’s lawsuit. An affirmative defense is a set of circumstances that indicate that the defendant should not be held liable, even if the plaintiff proves all of the facts in the complaint.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-05 Define civil litigation.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

49) Nick sues Bradford & Co., alleging employment discrimination. Nick believes Bradford & Co.’s e-mail will reveal evidence of discriminatory attitudes and actions by its management. Nick sends a letter to Bradford & Co., requesting copies of e-mail messages for the last six months, but receives no answer. What should Nick do?

 

Answer:  Nick can ask the court to compel Bradford & Co. to respond to the discovery request. If the uncooperative party has a reason for not complying, then that party may try to persuade the court of the validity of the refusal. If, however, Bradford & Co. cannot persuade the judge that the refusal is legally justified, the judge may impose severe penalties on the company. The judge may also decide to render a default judgment against them, and charge them with reasonable expenses due to the refusal to comply with discovery.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Civil Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-06 List the most common discovery techniques.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

50) Ashley is accused of forgery and is arrested by the city police. She is being compelled to testify, which she refuses to do. At the trial, she asserts her innocence and informs the jury that she was not informed of her rights by the officers at the time of her arrest, and was compelled to testify. She wants the jury to be instructed about the rights of a criminal defendant and the degree of proof required of both the prosecution and the defendant (her) in this case. Discuss the case.

 

Answer:  According to the Sixth and Fifth Amendments, a defendant must be informed of his or her right to be represented by a counsel and the right to remain silent at the time of arrest. The Fifth Amendment also states that a criminal defendant cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself. The judge’s instructions to the jury should explain the rules of law that the jurors are to apply to the facts in reaching their decision. In this case, the instructions must include the rule of law that the prosecution in a criminal case must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the defendant’s testimony may not hold, since she was not compelled to do so without being informed of her rights.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Criminal Procedure

Learning Objective:  03-10 Describe the steps in a criminal prosecution.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

Business Law with UCC Applications, 15e (Sukys)

Chapter 5   Criminal Law and Cybercrimes

 

1) The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government express authority to enact criminal law statutes.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  While the constitution does not give express authority, the federal government does enact criminal law and has set up the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as a national police force. The President also has cabinet-level criminal enforcement via the U.S. Attorney General and the Department of Homeland Security.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Definition and Classes of Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-01 Explain the purpose of criminal law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

2) A misdemeanor is a crime punishable by death/imprisonment in a federal/state prison for a term exceeding one year.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  No, a felony (not a misdemeanor) is a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in a federal or a state prison for a term exceeding one year. Some felonies are also punishable by fines.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Definition and Classes of Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-02 Enumerate the various categories and classes of crimes.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

3) Under American law, a crime can be committed regardless of whether an act has occurred.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Under American law, a crime cannot be committed unless some act has occurred. In other words, an individual cannot be charged with a crime for merely thinking of a criminal act.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Definition and Classes of Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-01 Explain the purpose of criminal law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

4) A person who cleans a hunting rifle without checking to see if it is loaded is acting with recklessness because that person has not bothered to look for any possible negative consequences that could result from those actions.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  This is an example of criminal negligence. Recklessness involves a perverse disregard of a known risk of negative consequences. People act recklessly when they are indifferent to a serious risk that they know exists.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Elements of a Crime

Learning Objective:  05-04 Identify the four mental states to be found in the criminal code.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

5) An individual can be convicted for a criminal act even if the prosecutor cannot prove the defendant had an evil motive for committing the crime.

 

Answer:  TRUE

Explanation:  Establishing motive may help the prosecution persuade the jury that the accused is guilty, but proving an evil motive is not necessary for a criminal conviction.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Elements of a Crime

Learning Objective:  05-03 Describe the nature of an act within the concept of criminal liability.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

6) Experts who believe in deterrence say that the criminal process should be presented in a public way, so that the public will learn the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Those experts who believe in deterrence advocate long and difficult prison sentences, so that other people in society are dissuaded from committing similar offenses and thus suffering the same fate.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Elements of a Crime

Learning Objective:  05-06 Explain the various theories of punishment within criminal law.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

7) Alfred drives his car very fast in a school zone when the school is releasing students at the end of the school day. A student dies when he is hit by Alfred’s car. Alfred has committed manslaughter with premeditation.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Some states specifically define premeditation as an action that results from the criminal defendant’s “prior calculation and design.” That does not appear to be the case here. Rather Alfred is most likely culpable of involuntary manslaughter which occurs when a killing results from negligence.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

8) A doctor who injects an antibiotic into a patient’s arm without the patient’s consent may be liable for assault.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  This is not an assault, but rather a battery. An assault is the threat of harm to a person. A battery is a crime in which the offender causes actual physical harm to the victim.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

9) Gabriel points a gun at a store clerk to frighten the clerk. This is an example of assault and battery.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Pointing the gun is only an assault, not an assault and battery. Assault is the threat of harm to the victim, in this case pointing the gun. Although some states , however, altered the actual language of the law and have completely eliminated the term battery and replaced it with the word assault.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Apply

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

10) George’s forced entry through a window along with his intention to rob a safe establishes the act of aggravated burglary.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Aggravated burglary includes everything that burglary includes but adds the use of a deadly weapon, the infliction of harm, the threat of harm, or the attempt to harm another person.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

11) In the Opening Case Round 3, United States v. Hearst, the authors state that Hearst’s attorney, F. Lee Bailey, argued that Hearst was not guilty of armed (or aggravated) robbery because no one was injured in the bank holdup.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Hearst engaged in the elements of armed robbery: (1) the robbery was photographed on the bank’s security cameras, (2) Hearst and her accomplices were seen carrying automatic weapons and were heard shouting commands at customers and bank employees, (3) on their way out of the bank, the robbers shot two people, and (4) the net amount stolen from the bank was $10,960.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Evaluate

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

12) The RICO Act covers only serious crimes, such as arson and robbery.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  To prevent a criminal invasion of legitimate businesses, Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Many of the offenses that fall within the scope of “racketeering activity”—such as arson and robbery—are serious crimes. Others, however, are less sinister. For example, both mail fraud and wire fraud fall within the definition of racketeering activities.

Difficulty: 2 Medium

Topic:  Specific Crimes

Learning Objective:  05-07 Enumerate and explain the elements of several key crimes.

Bloom’s:  Understand

AACSB:  Reflective Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

13) Stan threatens to use his computer skills to shut down the computers of the U.S. air traffic control system unless he is paid money. Stan is likely committing cyber-stalking.

 

Answer:  FALSE

Explanation:  Stan is most likely committing the crime of cyber-terrorism which involves using a computer to disrupt or destroy one of the critical elements of the nation’s cyber-infrastructure, such as the power grid, the air traffic control system, water and sanitation plants, the ground transportation system, a harbor traffic-control network, a cell tower network, the nation’s stock exchange, the banking system, hospital back-up generator systems, or the national defense system.

Difficulty: 3 Hard

Topic:  Cybercrimes

Learning Objective:  05-08 Define and explain the nature of cybercrimes.

Bloom’s:  Analyze

AACSB:  Analytical Thinking

Accessibility:  Keyboard Navigation

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business and Administrative Communication A Locker 12th Edition – Test Bank

Crafting and Executing Strategy The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts Arthur Thompson 22nd Edition- Test Bank

Experience Human Development 13Th Edition By Diane Papalia – Test Bank